Scholarlink

Purpose <p>Airway management is critical in lifesaving care, and effective airway clearance in emergency and combat settings requires portable suction devices that provide strong suction yet remain easy to carry. Existing options are either powerful but too large or portable but lack sufficient performance for field use. To address this gap, the Suction Capability for Emergencies: Portable Technology for Responders (SCEPTRE)—a compact, lightweight suction device—was developed.</p> Methods <p>SCEPTRE’s design and prototyping was guided by end-user feedback. Performance testing, defined <i>a priori</i> using published standards, characterized vacuum pressure, air flow rate, and liquid flow rate using water, blood simulant, and vomit simulant. SCEPTRE was compared to the SSCOR Quickdraw (battery-powered competitor) and Laerdal V-VAC (manually-powered competitor), with liquid flow normalized to device weight and volume.</p> Results <p>SCEPTRE achieved a vacuum pressure of 266.7 ± 2.1&#xa0;mmHg and an average air flow rate of 3.44 ± 0.04 L/min. Liquid flow testing across water, blood, and vomit simulants showed low variability, with flow rates of 1.65 ± 0.05, 1.65 ± 0.04, and 0.70 ± 0.04 L/min, respectively. For water, blood, and vomit, SSCOR reached 5.51 ± 0.13, 5.21 ± 0.22, and 1.78 ± 0.17 L/min, respectively, while V-VAC achieved 2.17 ± 0.23, 2.26 ± 0.32, and 1.14 ± 0.06 L/min, respectively. When normalized by weight and volume, SCEPTRE (0.206&#xa0;kg, 241 cm<sup>3</sup>) had a flow-to-weight ratio of&#xa0;8.25 L/min/kg and the highest&#xa0;flow-to-volume ratio (7.05&#xa0;× 10<sup>-3</sup> L/min/cm<sup>3</sup>). In comparison, V-VAC reached 8.84 L/min/kg with a lower flow-to-volume of 1.03 × 10⁻<sup>3</sup> L/min/cm<sup>3</sup>,&#xa0;and SSCOR showed 4.78 L/min/kg and 2.12 × 10⁻<sup>3</sup> L/min/cm<sup>3</sup>.</p> Conclusion <p>SCEPTRE achieved satisfactory performance for suction across physiologically relevant fluids and demonstrated high weight- and volume-normalized efficiency. These results support its potential use in combat and prehospital care and reinforce the value of weight- and volume-based metrics for portable suction devices.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The SCEPTRE Suction Device: Bridging Portability and Performance in Combat Medicine

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月6日

查看全文
  • Eric L. Wiatrek,
  • Maria J. Londono,
  • Saketh R. Peri,
  • Connor J. Evans,
  • Robert A. De Lorenzo,
  • R. Lyle Hood

摘要

Purpose

Airway management is critical in lifesaving care, and effective airway clearance in emergency and combat settings requires portable suction devices that provide strong suction yet remain easy to carry. Existing options are either powerful but too large or portable but lack sufficient performance for field use. To address this gap, the Suction Capability for Emergencies: Portable Technology for Responders (SCEPTRE)—a compact, lightweight suction device—was developed.

Methods

SCEPTRE’s design and prototyping was guided by end-user feedback. Performance testing, defined a priori using published standards, characterized vacuum pressure, air flow rate, and liquid flow rate using water, blood simulant, and vomit simulant. SCEPTRE was compared to the SSCOR Quickdraw (battery-powered competitor) and Laerdal V-VAC (manually-powered competitor), with liquid flow normalized to device weight and volume.

Results

SCEPTRE achieved a vacuum pressure of 266.7 ± 2.1 mmHg and an average air flow rate of 3.44 ± 0.04 L/min. Liquid flow testing across water, blood, and vomit simulants showed low variability, with flow rates of 1.65 ± 0.05, 1.65 ± 0.04, and 0.70 ± 0.04 L/min, respectively. For water, blood, and vomit, SSCOR reached 5.51 ± 0.13, 5.21 ± 0.22, and 1.78 ± 0.17 L/min, respectively, while V-VAC achieved 2.17 ± 0.23, 2.26 ± 0.32, and 1.14 ± 0.06 L/min, respectively. When normalized by weight and volume, SCEPTRE (0.206 kg, 241 cm3) had a flow-to-weight ratio of 8.25 L/min/kg and the highest flow-to-volume ratio (7.05 × 10-3 L/min/cm3). In comparison, V-VAC reached 8.84 L/min/kg with a lower flow-to-volume of 1.03 × 10⁻3 L/min/cm3, and SSCOR showed 4.78 L/min/kg and 2.12 × 10⁻3 L/min/cm3.

Conclusion

SCEPTRE achieved satisfactory performance for suction across physiologically relevant fluids and demonstrated high weight- and volume-normalized efficiency. These results support its potential use in combat and prehospital care and reinforce the value of weight- and volume-based metrics for portable suction devices.