<p>The computer-assisted automatic planning (CAAP) technology for percutaneous liver tumor ablation plays a crucial role in enhancing the precision and safety of minimally invasive treatments. CAAP reduces the manual workload of clinicians through path planning and treatment parameter optimization, while simultaneously improving planning efficiency and clinical reliability. This paper first reviews the basic principles of thermal ablation, including path planning, treatment parameter optimization, and temperature field modeling, and outlines the theoretical foundations of CAAP’s key technologies. The existing methods are then classified according to their technical characteristics, covering traditional optimization algorithms, intelligent optimization methods, and deep reinforcement learning techniques. The focus is on single-needle and multi-needle path planning, multi-objective optimization, and dynamic environmental adaptability technologies. Furthermore, the performance of these methods in automation, real-time processing, and multi-physics modeling is evaluated. Finally, potential future developments are proposed.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Computer-assisted Treatment Planning and Mathematical Modeling for Percutaneous Liver Tumor Ablation: An Updated Survey

  • Feifei Ding,
  • Weiwei Wu,
  • Wujun Jiang,
  • Zhuhuang Zhou,
  • Shuicai Wu

摘要

The computer-assisted automatic planning (CAAP) technology for percutaneous liver tumor ablation plays a crucial role in enhancing the precision and safety of minimally invasive treatments. CAAP reduces the manual workload of clinicians through path planning and treatment parameter optimization, while simultaneously improving planning efficiency and clinical reliability. This paper first reviews the basic principles of thermal ablation, including path planning, treatment parameter optimization, and temperature field modeling, and outlines the theoretical foundations of CAAP’s key technologies. The existing methods are then classified according to their technical characteristics, covering traditional optimization algorithms, intelligent optimization methods, and deep reinforcement learning techniques. The focus is on single-needle and multi-needle path planning, multi-objective optimization, and dynamic environmental adaptability technologies. Furthermore, the performance of these methods in automation, real-time processing, and multi-physics modeling is evaluated. Finally, potential future developments are proposed.