Aim <p>Gambling can afford a range of personal benefits to those who gamble, but can also pose significant risks, with gambling-related harm increasing alongside gambling risk severity and gambling engagement. While prior research has established a strong relationship between gambling severity and harm, the role of self-perceived gambling-related benefits in moderating this relationship remains underexplored.</p> Subject and methods <p>Utilizing self-report data from 1535 Brisbane gamblers, we examined whether perceived gambling-related benefits influence the association between gambling risk severity and harm, as well as between gambling engagement and harm.</p> Results <p>We found that gamblers who perceive greater benefits from their gambling report more gambling related harm. Consistent with prior research, higher gambling risk severity and gambling engagement are each associated with greater gambling harm, and self-perceived benefits amplify these relationships, although the amplification effect was small. A stronger effect was observed among gamblers with higher gambling risk severity and among infrequent gamblers.</p> Conclusion <p>These findings suggest that perceived benefits contribute to the maintenance of gambling behaviors despite adverse consequences, aligning with reinforcement-based models that explain problematic gambling. The results highlight the potential role of cognitive dissonance reduction in sustaining gambling engagement. Understanding these mechanisms can inform harm reduction strategies, such as psychoeducational interventions targeting exaggerated perceptions of gambling benefits.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Disentangling harms and benefits: how gambling benefits influence the relationship between risky gambling engagement and harm

  • Victoria Rowlatt,
  • Christina Malatzky,
  • Darren Wraith

摘要

Aim

Gambling can afford a range of personal benefits to those who gamble, but can also pose significant risks, with gambling-related harm increasing alongside gambling risk severity and gambling engagement. While prior research has established a strong relationship between gambling severity and harm, the role of self-perceived gambling-related benefits in moderating this relationship remains underexplored.

Subject and methods

Utilizing self-report data from 1535 Brisbane gamblers, we examined whether perceived gambling-related benefits influence the association between gambling risk severity and harm, as well as between gambling engagement and harm.

Results

We found that gamblers who perceive greater benefits from their gambling report more gambling related harm. Consistent with prior research, higher gambling risk severity and gambling engagement are each associated with greater gambling harm, and self-perceived benefits amplify these relationships, although the amplification effect was small. A stronger effect was observed among gamblers with higher gambling risk severity and among infrequent gamblers.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that perceived benefits contribute to the maintenance of gambling behaviors despite adverse consequences, aligning with reinforcement-based models that explain problematic gambling. The results highlight the potential role of cognitive dissonance reduction in sustaining gambling engagement. Understanding these mechanisms can inform harm reduction strategies, such as psychoeducational interventions targeting exaggerated perceptions of gambling benefits.