错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in patients with a history of total pharyngolaryngectomy: a Japanese nationwide retrospective cohort study

  • Akihiko Okamura,
  • Masayuki Watanabe,
  • Jun Okui,
  • Kengo Kuriyama,
  • Osamu Shiraishi,
  • Takanori Kurogochi,
  • Tetsuya Abe,
  • Hiroshi Sato,
  • Hiroshi Miyata,
  • Yoshihiko Kawaguchi,
  • Yusuke Sato,
  • Hiroaki Nagano,
  • Shinsuke Takeno,
  • Masanobu Nakajima,
  • Kentaro Matsuo,
  • Kentaro Murakami,
  • Katsushi Takebayashi,
  • Sohei Matsumoto,
  • Tomoyuki Okumura,
  • Yoshihiro Kakeji,
  • Koji Kono,
  • Nobuhiko Oridate,
  • Yasushi Toh,
  • Hiroya Takeuchi,
  • Yukio Katori

摘要

Background

Second primary esophageal cancer often develops in patients with head and neck cancer, and esophagectomy in patients with a history of total pharyngolaryngectomy (TPL) is challenging. However, the clinical outcomes of these patients have yet to be examined in a multicenter setting.

Methods

We evaluated the surgical outcomes of a nationwide cohort of 62 patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with a history of TPL.

Results

Ivor-Lewis and McKeown esophagectomies were performed in 32 (51.6%) and 30 (48.4%) patients, respectively. Postoperatively, 23 patients (37.1%) developed severe complications, and 7 patients (11.3%) required reoperation within 30 days. Pneumonia and anastomotic leakage occurred in 13 (21.0%) and 16 (25.8%) patients, respectively. Anastomotic leakage occurred more frequently in the McKeown group than in the Ivor-Lewis group (46.7% vs. 6.2%, P < 0.001). The adjusted odds ratio for anastomotic leakage in the McKeown group was 9.64 (95% confidence intervals (CI), 2.11–70.82, P = 0.008). Meanwhile, the 5-year overall survival rates were comparable between the groups (41.8% for Ivor-Lewis and 42.7% for McKeown), and the adjusted hazard ratio of overall survival was 1.44 (95% CI, 0.64–3.29; P = 0.381; Ivor-Lewis as the reference).

Conclusions

In our cohort, anastomotic leakage occurred more frequently after McKeown than Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy, and almost half of patients in the McKeown group experienced leakage. Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy is preferred for decreasing anastomotic leakage when oncologically and technically feasible.