Scholarlink

Objective <p>Structural MRI-based regional volumes are widely used for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) classification, but inter-individual variability in intracranial volume (ICV) introduces confounding. Traditional adjustment methods use region-of-interest (ROI)/ICV ratios or residual adjustment during pre-processing, yet no consensus exists on the optimal method. This study tests whether explicitly including ICV as a covariate (ROI + ICV) improves classification compared with ratio, residual adjustment, and the unadjusted baseline.</p> Materials and methods <p>T1-weighted MRIs from ADNI1 (<i>n</i> = 1423) and MIRIAD (<i>n</i> = 69) were processed with FreeSurfer to extract eight AD-related ROI volumes and ICV. Four feature configurations (ROI-only, ROI/ICV, Residual ROI, ROI + ICV) were benchmarked across six classifiers for cognitive normal (CN)–AD, CN–mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and MCI–AD. Performance was assessed with AUROC and F1 using Friedman and post hoc tests. In addition, feature attribution was examined with permutation importance and SHAP.</p> Results <p>ROI + ICV consistently produced the largest performance gains over ROI-only in CN–AD and CN–MCI, outperforming ratio and residual adjustment across most classifiers. These improvements generalized to the independent MIRIAD dataset. SHAP analyses showed that the directional effect of ICV reversed across strategies: under ratio or residual adjustment, larger ICV decreased AD probability, whereas in ROI + ICV, larger ICV increased it. This highlights ICV’s contextual influence on model decisions.</p> Discussion <p>Pre-processing-based adjustments do not fully remove ICV effects and can distort ROI–ICV relationships. Explicit covariate inclusion avoids these issues and yields more consistent, generalizable improvements. Thus, ICV should be modeled rather than removed, making ROI + ICV the preferred default ICV-handling strategy for MRI-based AD classification.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Inclusion of intracranial volume as a covariate feature improves MRI-based Alzheimer’s disease classification

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月6日

查看全文
  • Yongha Gi,
  • A. Hyun Jung,
  • Hyungjin Lim,
  • Sangyoon Park,
  • Jeongwon Lee,
  • Jong Hyun Kim,
  • Byung-Jo Kim,
  • Seol-Hee Baek,
  • Myonggeun Yoon

摘要

Objective

Structural MRI-based regional volumes are widely used for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) classification, but inter-individual variability in intracranial volume (ICV) introduces confounding. Traditional adjustment methods use region-of-interest (ROI)/ICV ratios or residual adjustment during pre-processing, yet no consensus exists on the optimal method. This study tests whether explicitly including ICV as a covariate (ROI + ICV) improves classification compared with ratio, residual adjustment, and the unadjusted baseline.

Materials and methods

T1-weighted MRIs from ADNI1 (n = 1423) and MIRIAD (n = 69) were processed with FreeSurfer to extract eight AD-related ROI volumes and ICV. Four feature configurations (ROI-only, ROI/ICV, Residual ROI, ROI + ICV) were benchmarked across six classifiers for cognitive normal (CN)–AD, CN–mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and MCI–AD. Performance was assessed with AUROC and F1 using Friedman and post hoc tests. In addition, feature attribution was examined with permutation importance and SHAP.

Results

ROI + ICV consistently produced the largest performance gains over ROI-only in CN–AD and CN–MCI, outperforming ratio and residual adjustment across most classifiers. These improvements generalized to the independent MIRIAD dataset. SHAP analyses showed that the directional effect of ICV reversed across strategies: under ratio or residual adjustment, larger ICV decreased AD probability, whereas in ROI + ICV, larger ICV increased it. This highlights ICV’s contextual influence on model decisions.

Discussion

Pre-processing-based adjustments do not fully remove ICV effects and can distort ROI–ICV relationships. Explicit covariate inclusion avoids these issues and yields more consistent, generalizable improvements. Thus, ICV should be modeled rather than removed, making ROI + ICV the preferred default ICV-handling strategy for MRI-based AD classification.