Purpose <p>Accurate quantification of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({T_2}^*\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </mrow> <mo>∗</mo> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> in the supracalvicular (SCV) fossa is critical for studying brown adipose tissue (BAT), but is challenged by respiratory motion-induced <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(B_0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>B</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> fluctuations. This study compares conventional Cartesian imaging to a radial stack-of-stars (SoS) trajectory, with and without retrospective temporal <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(B_0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>B</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> correction, in terms of PDFF and <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({T_2}^*\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </mrow> <mo>∗</mo> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> mapping precision.</p> Methods <p>Motion-induced <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(B_0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>B</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> fluctuations and tissue displacement were modeled using a digital anatomical phantom. Both Cartesian and radial SoS trajectories were simulated, with temporal <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(B_0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>B</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> correction, relying on oversampling of the <i>k</i>-space center, applied to the radial SoS data. Additionally, repeated in vivo scans were performed in four volunteers using both trajectories. PDFF and <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({T_2}^*\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </mrow> <mo>∗</mo> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> were quantified across repetitions.</p> Results <p> Simulations demonstrated smaller PDFF and <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({T_2}^*\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </mrow> <mo>∗</mo> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> errors in radial SoS compared to Cartesian imaging under the influence of simulated motion effects. In the simulations, the mean absolute PDFF error decreased from <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({1.07\,\mathrm{\%}}_\textrm{PDFF}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mrow> <mn>1.07</mn> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> <mtext>PDFF</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> with Cartesian to <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({0.47\,\mathrm{\%}}_\textrm{PDFF}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mrow> <mn>0.47</mn> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> <mtext>PDFF</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> with radial SoS, and the <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({T_2}^*\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </mrow> <mo>∗</mo> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> error decreased from 7.50&#xa0;ms to 3.37&#xa0;ms. In vivo, radial SoS provided higher repeatability for both parameters compared to Cartesian acquisitions, as measured by the inter-scan coefficient of variation. Retrospective temporal <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(B_0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>B</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> correction further improved the repeatability of <InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({T_2}^*\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </mrow> <mo>∗</mo> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> quantification.</p> Conclusions <p>Radial SoS imaging improves motion robustness and repeatability of PDFF and <InlineEquation ID="IEq16"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({T_2}^*\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </mrow> <mo>∗</mo> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> quantification in the SCV fossa compared to Cartesian acquisitions. Incorporating retrospective temporal <InlineEquation ID="IEq17"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(B_0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>B</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> correction further enhances <InlineEquation ID="IEq18"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({T_2}^*\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </mrow> <mo>∗</mo> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> reliability and may strengthen the precision of BAT activation studies.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Motion-robust proton density fat fraction and \({T_2}^*\) mapping in supraclavicular adipose tissue using radial stack-of-stars imaging

  • Johannes Raspe,
  • Jonathan Stelter,
  • Philipp Braun,
  • Daniela Junker,
  • Mingming Wu,
  • Dimitrios C. Karampinos

摘要

Purpose

Accurate quantification of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and \({T_2}^*\) T 2 in the supracalvicular (SCV) fossa is critical for studying brown adipose tissue (BAT), but is challenged by respiratory motion-induced \(B_0\) B 0 fluctuations. This study compares conventional Cartesian imaging to a radial stack-of-stars (SoS) trajectory, with and without retrospective temporal \(B_0\) B 0 correction, in terms of PDFF and \({T_2}^*\) T 2 mapping precision.

Methods

Motion-induced \(B_0\) B 0 fluctuations and tissue displacement were modeled using a digital anatomical phantom. Both Cartesian and radial SoS trajectories were simulated, with temporal \(B_0\) B 0 correction, relying on oversampling of the k-space center, applied to the radial SoS data. Additionally, repeated in vivo scans were performed in four volunteers using both trajectories. PDFF and \({T_2}^*\) T 2 were quantified across repetitions.

Results

Simulations demonstrated smaller PDFF and \({T_2}^*\) T 2 errors in radial SoS compared to Cartesian imaging under the influence of simulated motion effects. In the simulations, the mean absolute PDFF error decreased from \({1.07\,\mathrm{\%}}_\textrm{PDFF}\) 1.07 % PDFF with Cartesian to \({0.47\,\mathrm{\%}}_\textrm{PDFF}\) 0.47 % PDFF with radial SoS, and the \({T_2}^*\) T 2 error decreased from 7.50 ms to 3.37 ms. In vivo, radial SoS provided higher repeatability for both parameters compared to Cartesian acquisitions, as measured by the inter-scan coefficient of variation. Retrospective temporal \(B_0\) B 0 correction further improved the repeatability of \({T_2}^*\) T 2 quantification.

Conclusions

Radial SoS imaging improves motion robustness and repeatability of PDFF and \({T_2}^*\) T 2 quantification in the SCV fossa compared to Cartesian acquisitions. Incorporating retrospective temporal \(B_0\) B 0 correction further enhances \({T_2}^*\) T 2 reliability and may strengthen the precision of BAT activation studies.