Scholarlink

<p>The purpose of this study is to assess the ability of deep learning models to classify different subtypes of solid renal parenchymal tumors using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) images and to compare their classification performance. A retrospective study was conducted using CEUS images of 237 kidney tumors, including 46 angiomyolipomas (AML), 118 clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCC), 48 papillary RCCs (pRCC), and 25 chromophobe RCCs (chRCC), collected from January 2017 to December 2019. Two deep learning models, based on the ResNet-18 and RepVGG architectures, were trained and validated to distinguish between these subtypes. The models’ performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, F1 score, Matthews correlation coefficient, accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and confusion matrix analysis. Class activation mapping (CAM) was applied to visualize the specific regions that contributed to the models’ predictions. The ResNet-18 and RepVGG-A0 models achieved an overall accuracy of 76.7% and 84.5% across all four subtypes. The AUCs for AML, ccRCC, pRCC, and chRCC were 0.832, 0.829, 0.806, and 0.795 for the ResNet-18 model, compared to 0.906, 0.911, 0.840, and 0.827 for the RepVGG-A0 model, respectively. The deep learning models could reliably differentiate between various histological subtypes of renal tumors using CEUS images in an objective and non-invasive manner.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Deep Learning for Classification of Solid Renal Parenchymal Tumors Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年5月6日

查看全文
  • Yun Bai,
  • Zi-Chen An,
  • Lian-Fang Du,
  • Fan Li,
  • Ying-Yu Cai

摘要

The purpose of this study is to assess the ability of deep learning models to classify different subtypes of solid renal parenchymal tumors using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) images and to compare their classification performance. A retrospective study was conducted using CEUS images of 237 kidney tumors, including 46 angiomyolipomas (AML), 118 clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCC), 48 papillary RCCs (pRCC), and 25 chromophobe RCCs (chRCC), collected from January 2017 to December 2019. Two deep learning models, based on the ResNet-18 and RepVGG architectures, were trained and validated to distinguish between these subtypes. The models’ performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, F1 score, Matthews correlation coefficient, accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and confusion matrix analysis. Class activation mapping (CAM) was applied to visualize the specific regions that contributed to the models’ predictions. The ResNet-18 and RepVGG-A0 models achieved an overall accuracy of 76.7% and 84.5% across all four subtypes. The AUCs for AML, ccRCC, pRCC, and chRCC were 0.832, 0.829, 0.806, and 0.795 for the ResNet-18 model, compared to 0.906, 0.911, 0.840, and 0.827 for the RepVGG-A0 model, respectively. The deep learning models could reliably differentiate between various histological subtypes of renal tumors using CEUS images in an objective and non-invasive manner.