错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

On the generalized Zalcman conjecture

  • Vasudevarao Allu,
  • Abhishek Pandey

摘要

Let \(\mathcal {S}\) S denote the class of analytic and univalent (i.e., one-to-one) functions \( f(z)= z+\sum _{n=2}^{\infty }a_n z^n\) f ( z ) = z + n = 2 a n z n in the unit disk \(\mathbb {D}=\{z\in \mathbb {C}:|z|<1\}\) D = { z C : | z | < 1 } . For \(f\in \mathcal {S}\) f S , In 1999, Ma proposed the generalized Zalcman conjecture that \(\begin{aligned}|a_{n}a_{m}-a_{n+m-1}|\le (n-1)(m-1),\,\,\, \text{ for } n\ge 2,\, m\ge 2,\end{aligned}\) | a n a m - a n + m - 1 | ( n - 1 ) ( m - 1 ) , for n 2 , m 2 , with equality only for the Koebe function \(k(z) = z/(1 - z)^2\) k ( z ) = z / ( 1 - z ) 2 and its rotations. In the same paper, Ma (J Math Anal Appl 234:328–339, 1999) asked for what positive real values of \(\lambda \) λ does the following inequality hold? 0.1 \(\begin{aligned} |\lambda a_na_m-a_{n+m-1}|\le \lambda nm -n-m+1 \,\,\,\,\, (n\ge 2, \,m\ge 3). \end{aligned}\) | λ a n a m - a n + m - 1 | λ n m - n - m + 1 ( n 2 , m 3 ) . Clearly equality holds for the Koebe function \(k(z) = z/(1 - z)^2\) k ( z ) = z / ( 1 - z ) 2 and its rotations. In this paper, we prove the inequality (0.1) for \(\lambda =3, n=2, m=3\) λ = 3 , n = 2 , m = 3 . Further, we provide a geometric condition on extremal function maximizing (0.1) for \(\lambda =2,n=2, m=3\) λ = 2 , n = 2 , m = 3 .