Scholarlink

<p>Cybersecurity is essential for organizations of all sizes, as cyber threats can jeopardize their data, operations, reputation, and competitiveness. Consequently, a one-size-fits-all cybersecurity framework, especially one based solely on maturity levels, is neither practical nor effective, as acknowledged in recent literature critiquing universal maturity models (Liyanage et al. in Sok: identifying limitations and bridging gaps of cybersecurity capability maturity models (ccmms). arXiv preprint arXiv:240816140, <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.16140">https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.16140</a>, 2024). Instead, organizations require a scalable and adaptive framework that allows them to assess their current cybersecurity posture, identify gaps and risks, and implement targeted measures to enhance their cybersecurity maturity in a timely and practical manner. Maintaining continuous awareness of their cybersecurity status and understanding the degree of necessary improvement is critical. In response to these challenges and to address the limitations of existing capability models and frameworks, this paper proposes a novel framework, the Cyber-Resistivity Maturity and Scoring Framework (CRMSF). It emphasizes distinct capability evaluation attributes, including the use of weight factors, criticality and complexity analysis, benchmarking, and maturity levels.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Developing cyber-resistivity maturity and scoring framework (CRMSF) for any size of organization

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月20日

查看全文
  • Konstantinos Papachristofis,
  • Georgios Vardoulias,
  • Konstantinos Vavousis,
  • Costas Iordanou,
  • Yianna Danidou

摘要

Cybersecurity is essential for organizations of all sizes, as cyber threats can jeopardize their data, operations, reputation, and competitiveness. Consequently, a one-size-fits-all cybersecurity framework, especially one based solely on maturity levels, is neither practical nor effective, as acknowledged in recent literature critiquing universal maturity models (Liyanage et al. in Sok: identifying limitations and bridging gaps of cybersecurity capability maturity models (ccmms). arXiv preprint arXiv:240816140, https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.16140, 2024). Instead, organizations require a scalable and adaptive framework that allows them to assess their current cybersecurity posture, identify gaps and risks, and implement targeted measures to enhance their cybersecurity maturity in a timely and practical manner. Maintaining continuous awareness of their cybersecurity status and understanding the degree of necessary improvement is critical. In response to these challenges and to address the limitations of existing capability models and frameworks, this paper proposes a novel framework, the Cyber-Resistivity Maturity and Scoring Framework (CRMSF). It emphasizes distinct capability evaluation attributes, including the use of weight factors, criticality and complexity analysis, benchmarking, and maturity levels.