错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Clinical characteristics of monoclonal immunoglobulin-associated renal disease: a retrospective cohort study

  • Toshiyuki Narimiya,
  • Hiroki Hayashi,
  • Soshiro Ogata,
  • Shigeo Hara,
  • Akinao Okamoto,
  • Kazuo Takahashi,
  • Shigehisa Koide,
  • Daijo Inaguma,
  • Midori Hasegawa,
  • Akihiro Tomita,
  • Yukio Yuzawa,
  • Naotake Tsuboi

摘要

Introduction

Clinical epidemiological data on monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) are lacking. In this retrospective observational study, MGRS was compared with B-cell or plasma cell malignancies (BCM/PCM) with renal involvement to clarify differences in their clinical features.

Methods

Among the 1408 renal biopsies performed at our hospital, 25 MGRS and 18 BCM/PCM patients were identified. We investigated baseline characteristics and hematologic parameters of MGRS in reference to BCM/PCM using multivariable analysis. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and all-cause mortality.

Results

Comparing the MGRS with the BCM/PCM, mean differences in creatinine level, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and clonal bone marrow plasma cell percentage were − 2.76 mg/dL, 27.72 mL/min/1.73 m2, and − 18.86%, respectively (all P < 0.001). MGRS group had a predominance of glomerular lesions such as immunoglobulin-associated amyloidosis, cryoglobulinemic GN, and MIDD, and a lower risk of acute kidney injury/acute renal disease compared to BCM/PCM. During a median observation period of 23.7 months, clone-directed therapy was performed in 32.0% of patients in the MGRS group, compared to 83.3% of patients in the BCM/PCM group. Compared with BCM/PCM, MGRS had a hazard ratio of 0.66 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23–1.92, P = 0.45) for ESKD and 0.33 (95% CI 0.11–1.03, P = 0.06) for death in multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Conclusions

The clinical characteristics of MGRS and BCM/PCM with monoclonal immunoglobulin-associated renal disease are disparate. Understanding these differences is crucial for developing tailored clinical approaches and therapeutic strategies to improve patient outcome.