Scholarlink

Introduction <p>This study aims to compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of single-port laparoscopic Hartmann’s reversal (SPLHR) and open Hartmann’s reversal (OHR).</p> Material and methods <p>Consecutive patients who underwent OHR and SPLHR between 2019 and 2021 were analyzed retrospectively from a prospectively maintained database.</p> Results <p>During the study period, 23 patients underwent SPLHR and 24 patients underwent OHR. The median age, gender, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, and presence of midline/parastomal hernias were similar across the groups. The median estimated blood loss was significantly lower (100 versus 175&#xa0;ml, <i>p</i> = 0.011), and also the median operation time (92 versus 120&#xa0;min, <i>p</i> = 0.016) was shorter in the SPLHR group. Inadvertent bowel injury was more frequently observed in OHR group (37.5% versus 8.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.02). Overall postoperative complications did not differ between groups, but wound infections were significantly more common in the OHR group (33.3% versus 4.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.023). The SPLHR group experienced a shorter time to first flatus (median 2 versus 3&#xa0;days, <i>p</i> = 0.04), a shorter time to resuming a soft diet (median 2 versus 3&#xa0;days, <i>p</i> = 0.002), and a shorter length of hospital stay (4 versus 4.5&#xa0;days, <i>p</i> = 0.007).</p> Conclusion <p>This study confirms that SPLHR is a reliable and efficient method. SPLHR has several advantages in terms of perioperative morbidity and postoperative outcomes compared with OHR in selected patients.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Single-port laparoscopic versus open Hartmann’s reversal: a retrospective analysis on surgical and postoperative outcomes

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月16日

查看全文
  • A. Akmercan,
  • K. D. Batun,
  • H. İ. Sevindi,
  • T. Akmercan,
  • T. K. Uprak

摘要

Introduction

This study aims to compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of single-port laparoscopic Hartmann’s reversal (SPLHR) and open Hartmann’s reversal (OHR).

Material and methods

Consecutive patients who underwent OHR and SPLHR between 2019 and 2021 were analyzed retrospectively from a prospectively maintained database.

Results

During the study period, 23 patients underwent SPLHR and 24 patients underwent OHR. The median age, gender, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, and presence of midline/parastomal hernias were similar across the groups. The median estimated blood loss was significantly lower (100 versus 175 ml, p = 0.011), and also the median operation time (92 versus 120 min, p = 0.016) was shorter in the SPLHR group. Inadvertent bowel injury was more frequently observed in OHR group (37.5% versus 8.7%, p = 0.02). Overall postoperative complications did not differ between groups, but wound infections were significantly more common in the OHR group (33.3% versus 4.3%, p = 0.023). The SPLHR group experienced a shorter time to first flatus (median 2 versus 3 days, p = 0.04), a shorter time to resuming a soft diet (median 2 versus 3 days, p = 0.002), and a shorter length of hospital stay (4 versus 4.5 days, p = 0.007).

Conclusion

This study confirms that SPLHR is a reliable and efficient method. SPLHR has several advantages in terms of perioperative morbidity and postoperative outcomes compared with OHR in selected patients.