Scholarlink

Background <p>Radical resection for mid and low rectal cancer is probably the most challenging type of surgery in colorectal surgery, especially in a narrow male pelvis. In this study, we aimed to define a simple and effective evaluation method based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and body mass index (BMI) to predict the operation difficulty of radical resection for mid and low rectal cancer in male patients.</p> Methods <p>A total of 264 male patients who underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) due to primary rectal cancer located in the mid and low rectum (distal tumor margin distance from the anal verge ≤ 7&#xa0;cm) were retrospectively included in the study. An angle SAU° [formed by two lines: line&#xa0;1 (connecting the anteroinferior border of the fifth sacral vertebra and center point of anus) and line&#xa0;2 (connecting internal urethral orifice and center point of anus)] was measured using the built-in software of MRI for every patient. The patients were categorized into four groups according to the angle SAU° and BMI. The operative time, estimated blood loss, TME quality, and anastomotic leakage (AL) were compared between group&#xa0;1 and group&#xa0;2 as well as between group&#xa0;3 and group&#xa0;4.</p> Results <p>Group&#xa0;1 included 111 patients with angle SAU° &gt; 60 and BMI &lt; 25&#xa0;kg/m<sup>2</sup>; group&#xa0;2 included 51 patients with angle SAU° ≤ 60 and BMI &lt; 25&#xa0;kg/m<sup>2</sup>; group&#xa0;3 included 74 patients with angle SAU° &gt; 60 and BMI ≥ 25&#xa0;kg/m<sup>2</sup>; group&#xa0;4 included 28 patients with angle SAU° ≤ 60 and BMI ≥ 25&#xa0;kg/m<sup>2</sup>. The operative time, estimated blood loss, and the rate of AL in group&#xa0;1 and group&#xa0;3 were significantly less than those in group&#xa0;2 and group&#xa0;4, respectively (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). Similarly, the TME quality in group&#xa0;1 and group&#xa0;3 was significantly better than that in group&#xa0;2 and group&#xa0;4, respectively (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05).</p> Conclusion <p>Angle SAU° based on MRI combined with BMI is a simple and effective evaluation method to predict the difficulty in TME for male patients with mid and low rectal cancer. It may also have value in predicting AL.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A simple and effective evaluation method to determine the difficulty of total mesorectal excision for male patients with mid and lower rectal cancer

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月19日

查看全文
  • X. Huang,
  • Z. Xiao,
  • Z. Huang

摘要

Background

Radical resection for mid and low rectal cancer is probably the most challenging type of surgery in colorectal surgery, especially in a narrow male pelvis. In this study, we aimed to define a simple and effective evaluation method based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and body mass index (BMI) to predict the operation difficulty of radical resection for mid and low rectal cancer in male patients.

Methods

A total of 264 male patients who underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) due to primary rectal cancer located in the mid and low rectum (distal tumor margin distance from the anal verge ≤ 7 cm) were retrospectively included in the study. An angle SAU° [formed by two lines: line 1 (connecting the anteroinferior border of the fifth sacral vertebra and center point of anus) and line 2 (connecting internal urethral orifice and center point of anus)] was measured using the built-in software of MRI for every patient. The patients were categorized into four groups according to the angle SAU° and BMI. The operative time, estimated blood loss, TME quality, and anastomotic leakage (AL) were compared between group 1 and group 2 as well as between group 3 and group 4.

Results

Group 1 included 111 patients with angle SAU° > 60 and BMI < 25 kg/m2; group 2 included 51 patients with angle SAU° ≤ 60 and BMI < 25 kg/m2; group 3 included 74 patients with angle SAU° > 60 and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2; group 4 included 28 patients with angle SAU° ≤ 60 and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2. The operative time, estimated blood loss, and the rate of AL in group 1 and group 3 were significantly less than those in group 2 and group 4, respectively (P < 0.05). Similarly, the TME quality in group 1 and group 3 was significantly better than that in group 2 and group 4, respectively (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Angle SAU° based on MRI combined with BMI is a simple and effective evaluation method to predict the difficulty in TME for male patients with mid and low rectal cancer. It may also have value in predicting AL.