Scholarlink

<p>Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) due to hippocampal sclerosis (HS) is a leading cause of drug-resistant epilepsy. Surgical resection, particularly anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL), achieves high rates of seizure freedom, but outcomes vary. Identifying reliable preoperative predictors may optimize patient selection and surgical success.&#xa0;To systematically evaluate preoperative clinical, neuroimaging, and neuropsychological factors associated with postoperative seizure outcomes in MTLE.&#xa0;A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for cohort studies (2010–2025) reporting predictors of seizure freedom after MTLE-HS surgery. Eligible studies assessed one or more preoperative factors (clinical, EEG, imaging, neuropsychological) in relation to postoperative outcomes. Data were extracted for qualitative synthesis, and methodological quality was assessed with the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS).&#xa0;From 615 records, 24 studies were included, encompassing patients treated with ATL, selective amygdalohippocampectomy (SAHE), or stereotactic laser ablation. Seizure freedom rates (Engel I/ILAE 1) ranged from 50% to 75%, with ATL achieving ~ 70% at 1–2 years. Multimodal concordance—MRI-visible HS, unilateral seizure onset on EEG, and concordant PET hypometabolism—was the strongest predictor of seizure freedom. Bilateral EEG/PET abnormalities consistently predicted poorer outcomes, whereas structural measures, such as hippocampal subfield volumes and HS subtypes, showed little prognostic value.&#xa0;Multimodal presurgical concordance is a robust predictor of favorable outcomes in MTLE-HS surgery, whereas bilateral or discordant findings indicate a higher risk of failure. Comprehensive presurgical evaluation remains essential to optimize surgical decision-making.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Preoperative predictors of seizure outcomes after epilepsy surgery for mesial temporal sclerosis: A systematic review

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月20日

查看全文
  • Nikolas Correa-Molina,
  • Maria F. Cordoba-Gallego,
  • Maria K. Rivas-Montalvo,
  • Santiago Monroy-Santos,
  • Paula Martinez-Micolta,
  • Luis Carlos Mayor-Romero,
  • Juan S. Aguirre-Patiño,
  • Jheremy S. Reyes

摘要

Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) due to hippocampal sclerosis (HS) is a leading cause of drug-resistant epilepsy. Surgical resection, particularly anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL), achieves high rates of seizure freedom, but outcomes vary. Identifying reliable preoperative predictors may optimize patient selection and surgical success. To systematically evaluate preoperative clinical, neuroimaging, and neuropsychological factors associated with postoperative seizure outcomes in MTLE. A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for cohort studies (2010–2025) reporting predictors of seizure freedom after MTLE-HS surgery. Eligible studies assessed one or more preoperative factors (clinical, EEG, imaging, neuropsychological) in relation to postoperative outcomes. Data were extracted for qualitative synthesis, and methodological quality was assessed with the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS). From 615 records, 24 studies were included, encompassing patients treated with ATL, selective amygdalohippocampectomy (SAHE), or stereotactic laser ablation. Seizure freedom rates (Engel I/ILAE 1) ranged from 50% to 75%, with ATL achieving ~ 70% at 1–2 years. Multimodal concordance—MRI-visible HS, unilateral seizure onset on EEG, and concordant PET hypometabolism—was the strongest predictor of seizure freedom. Bilateral EEG/PET abnormalities consistently predicted poorer outcomes, whereas structural measures, such as hippocampal subfield volumes and HS subtypes, showed little prognostic value. Multimodal presurgical concordance is a robust predictor of favorable outcomes in MTLE-HS surgery, whereas bilateral or discordant findings indicate a higher risk of failure. Comprehensive presurgical evaluation remains essential to optimize surgical decision-making.