<p>In 1958, I. M. James raised two fundamental questions about octonionic Stiefel spaces <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(V_{k}(\mathbb{O}^{n})\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">O</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. The first breakthrough was made by Qian, Tang, Yan in 2022. The present paper is divided into two parts. The first one shows that neither of two natural projections <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(V_{k+2}(\mathbb{O}^n) \xrightarrow{\pi_2} V_k(\mathbb{O}^n)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">O</mi> </mrow> <mi>n</mi> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mover> <mo>→</mo> <mpadded lspace="0.278em" voffset=".15em" width="+0.611em"> <msub> <mi>π</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </mpadded> </mover> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mi>k</mi> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">O</mi> </mrow> <mi>n</mi> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(V_{k+3}(\mathbb{O}^n) \xrightarrow{\pi_3} V_k(\mathbb{O}^n)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">O</mi> </mrow> <mi>n</mi> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mover> <mo>→</mo> <mpadded lspace="0.278em" voffset=".15em" width="+0.611em"> <msub> <mi>π</mi> <mn>3</mn> </msub> </mpadded> </mover> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mi>k</mi> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">O</mi> </mrow> <mi>n</mi> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is a fiber bundle. The second one proves the parallelizability of closed manifold Ω<sub><i>l,m</i></sub>, which contains <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(V_{3}(\mathbb{O}^n)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">O</mi> </mrow> <mi>n</mi> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> as a special case.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

New Results On James’ Questions

  • Haoyang Sun

摘要

In 1958, I. M. James raised two fundamental questions about octonionic Stiefel spaces \(V_{k}(\mathbb{O}^{n})\) V k ( O n ) . The first breakthrough was made by Qian, Tang, Yan in 2022. The present paper is divided into two parts. The first one shows that neither of two natural projections \(V_{k+2}(\mathbb{O}^n) \xrightarrow{\pi_2} V_k(\mathbb{O}^n)\) V k + 2 ( O n ) π 2 V k ( O n ) and \(V_{k+3}(\mathbb{O}^n) \xrightarrow{\pi_3} V_k(\mathbb{O}^n)\) V k + 3 ( O n ) π 3 V k ( O n ) is a fiber bundle. The second one proves the parallelizability of closed manifold Ωl,m, which contains \(V_{3}(\mathbb{O}^n)\) V 3 ( O n ) as a special case.