<p>Standard mixed-integer programming formulations for the stable set problem on <i>n</i>-node graphs require <i>n</i> integer variables. We prove that this is almost optimal: We give a family of <i>n</i>-node graphs for which every polynomial-size MIP formulation requires <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( \varOmega (n/\log ^2 n) \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>Ω</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <msup> <mo>log</mo> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> integer variables. By a polyhedral reduction we obtain an analogous result for <i>n</i>-item knapsack problems. In both cases, this improves the previously known bounds of <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( \varOmega (\sqrt{n}/\log n) \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>Ω</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msqrt> <mi>n</mi> </msqrt> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <mo>log</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> by Cevallos et al.&#xa0;(in Proceedings of the twenty-ninth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms (SODA), SIAM, 2018). To this end, we show that there exists a family of <i>n</i>-node graphs whose stable set polytopes satisfy the following: any <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((1+\nicefrac {\varepsilon }{n})\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo> <mfrac bevelled="true"> <mi>ε</mi> <mi>n</mi> </mfrac> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-approximate extended formulation for these polytopes, for some constant <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( \varepsilon &gt; 0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>ε</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, has size <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(2^{\varOmega (n/\log n)}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mn>2</mn> <mrow> <mi>Ω</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <mo>log</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Our proof extends and simplifies the information-theoretic methods due to Göös et al. (SIAM J Comput 47(1):241–269, 2018) who showed the same result for the case of exact extended formulations (i.e. <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varepsilon = 0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>ε</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>).</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Lower bounds on the complexity of mixed-integer programs for stable set and knapsack

  • Jamico Schade,
  • Makrand Sinha,
  • Stefan Weltge

摘要

Standard mixed-integer programming formulations for the stable set problem on n-node graphs require n integer variables. We prove that this is almost optimal: We give a family of n-node graphs for which every polynomial-size MIP formulation requires \( \varOmega (n/\log ^2 n) \) Ω ( n / log 2 n ) integer variables. By a polyhedral reduction we obtain an analogous result for n-item knapsack problems. In both cases, this improves the previously known bounds of \( \varOmega (\sqrt{n}/\log n) \) Ω ( n / log n ) by Cevallos et al. (in Proceedings of the twenty-ninth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms (SODA), SIAM, 2018). To this end, we show that there exists a family of n-node graphs whose stable set polytopes satisfy the following: any \((1+\nicefrac {\varepsilon }{n})\) ( 1 + ε n ) -approximate extended formulation for these polytopes, for some constant \( \varepsilon > 0\) ε > 0 , has size \(2^{\varOmega (n/\log n)}\) 2 Ω ( n / log n ) . Our proof extends and simplifies the information-theoretic methods due to Göös et al. (SIAM J Comput 47(1):241–269, 2018) who showed the same result for the case of exact extended formulations (i.e. \(\varepsilon = 0\) ε = 0 ).