Scholarlink

<p>This study compared the efficacy of 570&#xa0;nm and 590&#xa0;nm yellow light, combined with red light and infrared LED phototherapy, in treating facial skin photoaging.&#xa0;Thirty patients with skin photoaging were enrolled between December 2024 and January 2025 and randomly assigned to two groups: the 570&#xa0;nm combined LED group (hereafter referred to as the 570 group) and the 590&#xa0;nm combined LED group (hereafter referred to as the 590 group), with 15 patients in each. The 570 group received treatment using 570&#xa0;nm yellow light, 620&#xa0;nm red light, and 850&#xa0;nm infrared light (power density: 7.1 mW/cm²; total energy: 6.39&#xa0;J/cm²), while the 590 group was treated with 590&#xa0;nm yellow light alongside the same red and infrared wavelengths and identical parameters. Treatments were administered three times weekly for 8 weeks. GSP scores and VISIA skin imaging analyzer assessments (pores, wrinkles, texture, brown spots) were recorded pre- and post-treatment.&#xa0;Twenty-eight subjects (93.3%) completed the study. After 8 weeks, the 570 group showed significant reductions in GSP scores, wrinkle scores, and brown spot scores compared to baseline (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). The 590 group also demonstrated reductions in GSP and wrinkle scores (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). The difference in wrinkle scores between the two groups post-treatment was statistically significant (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05).&#xa0;Both 570&#xa0;nm and 590&#xa0;nm yellow light, combined with red light and infrared LED therapy, effectively reduce pores, wrinkles, texture, and brown spots, improving skin photoaging. The 570&#xa0;nm yellow composite LED treatment showed more significant effects on both facial wrinkles and brown spots.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Efficacy and safety of 570/590 Nm yellow light combined with red light and infrared LED in treating facial skin photoaging: A Single-Center, randomized Controlled, exploratory study

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月15日

查看全文
  • Shiyun Yi,
  • Jie Ding,
  • Xihao Li,
  • Xing Guo,
  • Hongxuan Wu,
  • Xianwei Cao,
  • Duyang Wang,
  • Zhibin Zhang

摘要

This study compared the efficacy of 570 nm and 590 nm yellow light, combined with red light and infrared LED phototherapy, in treating facial skin photoaging. Thirty patients with skin photoaging were enrolled between December 2024 and January 2025 and randomly assigned to two groups: the 570 nm combined LED group (hereafter referred to as the 570 group) and the 590 nm combined LED group (hereafter referred to as the 590 group), with 15 patients in each. The 570 group received treatment using 570 nm yellow light, 620 nm red light, and 850 nm infrared light (power density: 7.1 mW/cm²; total energy: 6.39 J/cm²), while the 590 group was treated with 590 nm yellow light alongside the same red and infrared wavelengths and identical parameters. Treatments were administered three times weekly for 8 weeks. GSP scores and VISIA skin imaging analyzer assessments (pores, wrinkles, texture, brown spots) were recorded pre- and post-treatment. Twenty-eight subjects (93.3%) completed the study. After 8 weeks, the 570 group showed significant reductions in GSP scores, wrinkle scores, and brown spot scores compared to baseline (P < 0.05). The 590 group also demonstrated reductions in GSP and wrinkle scores (P < 0.05). The difference in wrinkle scores between the two groups post-treatment was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Both 570 nm and 590 nm yellow light, combined with red light and infrared LED therapy, effectively reduce pores, wrinkles, texture, and brown spots, improving skin photoaging. The 570 nm yellow composite LED treatment showed more significant effects on both facial wrinkles and brown spots.