<p>Thermal treatment of sewage sludge offers a viable route for energy recovery; however, its high moisture content limits incineration performance and increases auxiliary fuel demand. In this study, a steady-state Aspen Plus model integrating sludge drying, fluidized bed incineration, and power generation was developed using experimentally characterized sewage sludge from the Khouribga wastewater treatment plant (Morocco). Two process configurations were evaluated to analyze the impact of energy integration on system performance. In scenario 1, natural gas was continuously used for drying, while the energy released during sludge incineration was fully directed to power generation. In scenario 2, natural gas was considered only for startup, and internal heat integration was implemented by reusing incinerator exhaust gases for drying and power generation, along with preheating of combustion and dilution air. For a feed of 1&#xa0;t&#xa0;h<sup>−1</sup> of wet sludge, scenario 1 produced a net power output of 250&#xa0;kW, with CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of 529&#xa0;kg per ton of wet sludge and residual waste heat of 1.71&#xa0;MW. Under the modeled steady-state conditions, scenario 2 reduced CO<sub>2</sub> emissions to 432.06&#xa0;kg per ton of wet sludge (− 18.34%) and residual waste heat to 715.8&#xa0;kW (− 58.14%), while maintaining a net power output of 206 kW. A slight increase in NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions was observed in the integrated configuration, indicating the need for combustion optimization. The results demonstrate that internal heat integration can improve energy utilization and reduce steady-state fossil fuel demand in sewage sludge thermal treatment systems. However, the analysis is limited to steady-state process simulation and does not account for transient startup fuel consumption, flue gas-cleaning energy penalties, or full techno-economic and social dimensions. The findings should therefore be interpreted as a process-level comparison of alternative energy integration strategies.</p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Proposed system for thermal treatment of sewage sludge: process simulation using aspen plus

  • Zakaria Chalhe,
  • Mariam Tangarfa,
  • Chouaib Benqlilou,
  • Aboubakr Cherki

摘要

Thermal treatment of sewage sludge offers a viable route for energy recovery; however, its high moisture content limits incineration performance and increases auxiliary fuel demand. In this study, a steady-state Aspen Plus model integrating sludge drying, fluidized bed incineration, and power generation was developed using experimentally characterized sewage sludge from the Khouribga wastewater treatment plant (Morocco). Two process configurations were evaluated to analyze the impact of energy integration on system performance. In scenario 1, natural gas was continuously used for drying, while the energy released during sludge incineration was fully directed to power generation. In scenario 2, natural gas was considered only for startup, and internal heat integration was implemented by reusing incinerator exhaust gases for drying and power generation, along with preheating of combustion and dilution air. For a feed of 1 t h−1 of wet sludge, scenario 1 produced a net power output of 250 kW, with CO2 emissions of 529 kg per ton of wet sludge and residual waste heat of 1.71 MW. Under the modeled steady-state conditions, scenario 2 reduced CO2 emissions to 432.06 kg per ton of wet sludge (− 18.34%) and residual waste heat to 715.8 kW (− 58.14%), while maintaining a net power output of 206 kW. A slight increase in NOx emissions was observed in the integrated configuration, indicating the need for combustion optimization. The results demonstrate that internal heat integration can improve energy utilization and reduce steady-state fossil fuel demand in sewage sludge thermal treatment systems. However, the analysis is limited to steady-state process simulation and does not account for transient startup fuel consumption, flue gas-cleaning energy penalties, or full techno-economic and social dimensions. The findings should therefore be interpreted as a process-level comparison of alternative energy integration strategies.

Graphical Abstract