Scholarlink

Purpose <p>Benzylpenicillin is regaining attention as a treatment option for susceptible <i>S. aureus</i>, including in severe invasive diseases such as blood stream infections. Timely and reliable susceptibility determination is essential to support its use in clinical practice. In this study, we assessed the EUCAST-recommended methodology of interpreting zone edges in a national multicenter trial.</p> Methods <p>In total, nine microbiology laboratories in Austria participated. Each center received 10 isolates in blinded duplicates, all with inhibition zones of ≥ 26&#xa0;mm. Three were <i>blaZ</i>-positive with sharp edges and seven were <i>blaZ</i>-negative with fuzzy edges. Benzylpenicillin susceptibility testing according to EUCAST guidelines using 1 unit discs was performed by two independent technicians in duplicate on two separate days. All plates were interpreted by two different assessors generating a total of 1440 data points.</p> Results <p>Overall, 85.5% of all interpretations were correct. Both, major and very major errors occurred. There was high variability between laboratories with overall accuracy ranging from 61.9% to 100%. There were statistically significant differences in the average inhibition zone between MH agars from different manufacturers. Laboratories using agars giving rise to a smaller average inhibition zone (i.e. lower diffusion of benzylpenicillin) performed less well. Laboratories with the methodology implemented performed better than those without experience.</p> Conclusion <p>In summary, our study demonstrates that benzylpenicillin susceptibility testing using the EUCAST-recommended methodology is feasible, but accurate and reproducible assessment of zone edges requires both experience and optimal materials. Thorough validation of locally used materials is therefore essential before implementing this approach for routine use.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Variability and interpretability of benzylpenicillin inhibition zone edges in Staphylococcus aureus – a multi-center study in Austria

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月23日

查看全文
  • Felix Lötsch,
  • David N. Springer,
  • Brigitte Selitsch,
  • Sonja Lener,
  • Barbara Ströbele,
  • Lamiss Mejdoubi,
  • Philipp Grubwieser,
  • Silke Huber,
  • Dieter Mitteregger,
  • Harald Dirschmid,
  • Verena Schliesser,
  • Alexandra Wojna,
  • Markus Hell,
  • Birgit Willinger

摘要

Purpose

Benzylpenicillin is regaining attention as a treatment option for susceptible S. aureus, including in severe invasive diseases such as blood stream infections. Timely and reliable susceptibility determination is essential to support its use in clinical practice. In this study, we assessed the EUCAST-recommended methodology of interpreting zone edges in a national multicenter trial.

Methods

In total, nine microbiology laboratories in Austria participated. Each center received 10 isolates in blinded duplicates, all with inhibition zones of ≥ 26 mm. Three were blaZ-positive with sharp edges and seven were blaZ-negative with fuzzy edges. Benzylpenicillin susceptibility testing according to EUCAST guidelines using 1 unit discs was performed by two independent technicians in duplicate on two separate days. All plates were interpreted by two different assessors generating a total of 1440 data points.

Results

Overall, 85.5% of all interpretations were correct. Both, major and very major errors occurred. There was high variability between laboratories with overall accuracy ranging from 61.9% to 100%. There were statistically significant differences in the average inhibition zone between MH agars from different manufacturers. Laboratories using agars giving rise to a smaller average inhibition zone (i.e. lower diffusion of benzylpenicillin) performed less well. Laboratories with the methodology implemented performed better than those without experience.

Conclusion

In summary, our study demonstrates that benzylpenicillin susceptibility testing using the EUCAST-recommended methodology is feasible, but accurate and reproducible assessment of zone edges requires both experience and optimal materials. Thorough validation of locally used materials is therefore essential before implementing this approach for routine use.