Comparison of agreement between three classification criteria for early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) in Shanxi Province of China
摘要
To compare the agreement between three classification criteria for early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) in Shanxi Province of China.
MethodsPatients whose age was more than 16 years old, disease duration no more than 2 years, and at least one joint swelling and tenderness were enrolled in a multicenter, retrospective cohort. The patients were grouped as RA or non-RA with detailed clinical and laboratory parameters recorded. The sensitivity and specificity of these criteria were compared with McNemar, and the areas under the ROC curves (AUC) were analyzed with MedCalc. The level of agreement between the three classification criteria was analyzed with kappa coefficient.
ResultsA total of 834 patients were enrolled, including 596 ERA and 238 non-RA. The sensitivity of ERA criteria (87.1%) was significantly higher than that of the 1987 ACR criteria (50.2%, P < 0.001) and similar to the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria (89.4%, P > 0.05). The specificity of ERA criteria (92.0%) was similar to the 2010 ACR/EULAR (91.2%, P > 0.05) and 1987 ACR criteria (95.8%, P > 0.05). The AUC related to ERA (0.964) was slightly superior to that of 2010 ACR/EULAR (0.962, P > 0.05) and significantly higher than the 1987 ACR criteria (0.898, P < 0.001). The level of agreement between the 1987 ACR and 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria was 0.383; the 2010 ACR/EULAR and ERA criteria were 0.762, while the 1987 ACR and ERA criteria were 0.473.
ConclusionThe ERA and 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria were accordant. They identified more ERA patients than did the 1987 criteria. The ERA criteria are more feasible than the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria.