Background <p>The concept of difficult-to-manage axial spondyloarthritis (D2M-axSpA), recently defined by ASAS, identifies patients with persistent active disease despite failure of ≥ 2 b/tsDMARDs with different mechanisms of action. Refractory axSpA (TR) represents a more severe subset with objective signs of inflammation. Objective:</p> <p>To estimate the frequency of D2M in the Reuma-Check axSpA cohort, describe treatment trajectories, and identify baseline characteristics associated with D2M.</p> Methods <p>This prospective observational study (2017–2024) included axSpA patients ≥ 18&#xa0;years old assessed via the structured Reuma-Check protocol. Baseline data included demographics, sacroiliac imaging (X-ray, MRI), ultrasound, CRP, and disease activity measures (BASDAI, ASDAS, BASFI). D2M was defined using ASAS criteria. Comparative and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify associated factors.</p> Results <p>Among 129 axSpA patients, 11 (8.53%) met criteria for D2M. Only four fulfilled criteria for TR. Compared to non-D2M, these patients showed significantly higher BASFI (4.2 vs. 2.9), BASDAI (5.1 vs. 3.5), and ASDAS (3.7 vs. 2.8). Significant categorical predictors included smoking, psoriasis, sacroiliac joint tenderness, and peripheral structural damage. Articular ultrasound abnormalities were present in 75% of D2M patients and emerged as the only independent predictor (OR = 10.65; 95% CI: 1.42–80.09). Regarding treatment patterns, 50% of patients initiated b/tsDMARDs; 30% failed first-line therapy, and 57% of those failed second-line treatment. Third-line therapies included JAK inhibitors (54%), IL-17 inhibitors (27%), and TNFi (19%).</p> Conclusion <p>D2M-axSpA was identified in approximately 9% of patients using ASAS criteria. A combination of clinical and imaging features—especially ultrasound—may assist in early identification and tailored management.<Table Float="No" ID="Taba"> <tgroup cols="2"> <colspec align="left" colname="c1" colnum="1" /> <colspec align="left" colname="c2" colnum="2" /> <tbody> <row> <entry nameend="c2" namest="c1"> <p><b>Key Points</b></p> <p>•&#xa0;<i>D2M-axSpA affects nearly 9% of patients in real-world clinical practice.</i></p> <p>•&#xa0;<i>Clinical and structural predictors such as psoriasis and joint damage are associated with D2M.</i></p> <p>•&#xa0;<i>Articular ultrasound is a key tool for identifying high-risk patients.</i></p> </entry> </row> </tbody> </tgroup> </Table></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Difficult-to-Manage Axial Spondyloarthritis According to ASAS Criteria in Reuma-Check Cohort: Frequency, Predictive Factors, and Treatment Patterns

  • Rodrigo Garcia-Salinas,
  • Nataly Mejia-Maggi,
  • Santiago Ruta,
  • Gisela Reyes-Jara,
  • Juan Arguello,
  • Sebastián Juan Magri

摘要

Background

The concept of difficult-to-manage axial spondyloarthritis (D2M-axSpA), recently defined by ASAS, identifies patients with persistent active disease despite failure of ≥ 2 b/tsDMARDs with different mechanisms of action. Refractory axSpA (TR) represents a more severe subset with objective signs of inflammation. Objective:

To estimate the frequency of D2M in the Reuma-Check axSpA cohort, describe treatment trajectories, and identify baseline characteristics associated with D2M.

Methods

This prospective observational study (2017–2024) included axSpA patients ≥ 18 years old assessed via the structured Reuma-Check protocol. Baseline data included demographics, sacroiliac imaging (X-ray, MRI), ultrasound, CRP, and disease activity measures (BASDAI, ASDAS, BASFI). D2M was defined using ASAS criteria. Comparative and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify associated factors.

Results

Among 129 axSpA patients, 11 (8.53%) met criteria for D2M. Only four fulfilled criteria for TR. Compared to non-D2M, these patients showed significantly higher BASFI (4.2 vs. 2.9), BASDAI (5.1 vs. 3.5), and ASDAS (3.7 vs. 2.8). Significant categorical predictors included smoking, psoriasis, sacroiliac joint tenderness, and peripheral structural damage. Articular ultrasound abnormalities were present in 75% of D2M patients and emerged as the only independent predictor (OR = 10.65; 95% CI: 1.42–80.09). Regarding treatment patterns, 50% of patients initiated b/tsDMARDs; 30% failed first-line therapy, and 57% of those failed second-line treatment. Third-line therapies included JAK inhibitors (54%), IL-17 inhibitors (27%), and TNFi (19%).

Conclusion

D2M-axSpA was identified in approximately 9% of patients using ASAS criteria. A combination of clinical and imaging features—especially ultrasound—may assist in early identification and tailored management.

Key Points

• D2M-axSpA affects nearly 9% of patients in real-world clinical practice.

• Clinical and structural predictors such as psoriasis and joint damage are associated with D2M.

• Articular ultrasound is a key tool for identifying high-risk patients.