A cross-sectional survey on VEXAS syndrome: insights from a global expert panel
摘要
Vacuolization, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic (VEXAS) syndrome is recently described, for which the diagnosis and management lack official guidelines.
AimsTo assess the diagnostic capabilities and disease management of VEXAS syndrome among physicians in the global context.
MethodsAn electronic survey was sent to clinicians with expertise in VEXAS syndrome between January and February 2025 to gather real-life data on the management of VEXAS.
ResultsSeventy-four clinicians completed the survey from Europe (n = 51, 68.9%), North America (n = 9, 12.2%), Australasia (n = 6, 8.1%), Asia (n = 6, 8.1%), Africa (n = 1, 1.4%), and South America (n = 1, 1.4%), mostly being hematologists (n = 24, 32.4%) and rheumatologists (n = 24, 32.4%). Majority of the clinicians were managing between 1 and 4 (n = 40, 54.1%) and 5 and 9 patients (n = 17, 23%) with VEXAS syndrome, with regular clinic review, typically under 7-weekly intervals (n = 44, 59.5%).
UBA1 mutation testing was available for 76% of physicians and next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the entire gene was most common (n = 24, 32.9%) with a turnaround time within 12 weeks. C-reactive protein (CRP) was selected by over half of the clinicians (n = 35, 55.4%) as a marker of disease relapse. Treatment with corticosteroids at 1 mg/kg (n = 48, 64.9%) was the most common initial dosing and upfront systemic immunomodulatory treatment was added by more than half of clinicians (n = 39, 52.7%). The most frequent treatments of choice (n = 66) were Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) and IL-6 targeted monoclonal antibodies (both n = 21, 31.8%). Azacitidine was mostly used in patients with concomitant myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (69.9%). Only 29.6% indicated that allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) had been successfully completed in their department.
ConclusionsThis is the first clinician survey on VEXAS syndrome, encompassing a global representation of multiple specialties on current disease management, highlighting several unmet needs (longitudinal follow-up, lack of on-label drugs, financial toxicity) actionable for future research.