Scholarlink

<p>The roughness of rock discontinuities is a crucial parameter that influences mechanical properties. Many scholars have proposed different roughness parameters from both 2D and 3D perspectives. 3D roughness parameters capture more detailed discontinuity surface undulations, while 2D parameters remain popular due to their easier measurement and simpler calculations. However, systematic investigations into the correlations between 2D and 3D roughness parameters using the same evaluation method are notably lacking. In this study, three natural discontinuities were selected, and their point cloud data were obtained. The roughness of each discontinuity was evaluated based on three sets of parameters (<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({Z^{\prime}_2}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({Z^{\prime}_{23{\text{D}}}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\theta _{{max}}^{*}/{(C+1)_{2{\text{D}}}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\theta _{{max}}^{*}/{(C+1)_{3{\text{D}}}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <i>PAP</i><sub>2D</sub> and <i>PAP</i><sub>3D</sub>), respectively, and the correlations of each set of parameters were analyzed. Additionally, the roughness evaluation effects of them were further studied and compared with the <i>JRC</i> values via direct shear tests of artificial discontinuities. The results show that: (1) Certain deviations exist between the evaluation results of 2D parameters based on local profiles and those of their corresponding 3D counterparts. (2) There is a linear correlation between the 2D parameter evaluation results using uniform profiles and the corresponding 3D parameter evaluation results, and the correlation increases with reduced profile. (3) When both the profile spacing and the point cloud point spacing reach 0.3&#xa0;mm, uniform profile-based 2D roughness evaluations match 3D counterpart analyses.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A study of the relationship between two-dimensional and three-dimensional roughness parameters

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月29日

查看全文
  • Yi Cai,
  • Qi Li,
  • Hu Li,
  • Huazhang Shen,
  • Guojun Cai,
  • Ning Zhang,
  • Rui Pan

摘要

The roughness of rock discontinuities is a crucial parameter that influences mechanical properties. Many scholars have proposed different roughness parameters from both 2D and 3D perspectives. 3D roughness parameters capture more detailed discontinuity surface undulations, while 2D parameters remain popular due to their easier measurement and simpler calculations. However, systematic investigations into the correlations between 2D and 3D roughness parameters using the same evaluation method are notably lacking. In this study, three natural discontinuities were selected, and their point cloud data were obtained. The roughness of each discontinuity was evaluated based on three sets of parameters ( \({Z^{\prime}_2}\) and \({Z^{\prime}_{23{\text{D}}}}\) , \(\theta _{{max}}^{*}/{(C+1)_{2{\text{D}}}}\) and \(\theta _{{max}}^{*}/{(C+1)_{3{\text{D}}}}\) , PAP2D and PAP3D), respectively, and the correlations of each set of parameters were analyzed. Additionally, the roughness evaluation effects of them were further studied and compared with the JRC values via direct shear tests of artificial discontinuities. The results show that: (1) Certain deviations exist between the evaluation results of 2D parameters based on local profiles and those of their corresponding 3D counterparts. (2) There is a linear correlation between the 2D parameter evaluation results using uniform profiles and the corresponding 3D parameter evaluation results, and the correlation increases with reduced profile. (3) When both the profile spacing and the point cloud point spacing reach 0.3 mm, uniform profile-based 2D roughness evaluations match 3D counterpart analyses.