<p>The maximum impact force (<i>F</i><sub>max</sub>) and maximum penetration depth (<i>δ</i><sub><i>max</i></sub>) are critical parameters in the design of rockfall protection structures. Current methods for calculating rockfall impact force often simplify the rockfall as a sphere, thereby neglecting the significant effects of rockfall shape and impact angle, which can lead to estimation inaccuracies. Through experimental and numerical analyses, we demonstrate that the <i>F</i><sub>max</sub> occurs at a 90° impact angle, with the <i>F</i><sub>max</sub> of an ellipsoidal rockfall (sphericity = 0.6) being 1.42 times greater than that of a spherical rockfall. Conversely, at a 0° impact angle, the <i>δ</i><sub><i>max</i></sub> of ellipsoidal rockfall is 1.72 times greater than its spherical rockfall. This phenomenon indicates that calculating impact force by assuming a spherical rockfall shape may underestimate the actual impact force, resulting in inadequate safety of the protective structure. Based on these findings, we propose two innovative calculation methods for evaluating the <i>F</i><sub>max</sub> and <i>δ</i><sub><i>max</i></sub> exerted by an ellipsoidal rockfall impacting a sand cushion. The first method proposes the shape magnification coefficient, and establishes the quantitative conversion relationship for <i>F</i><sub>max</sub> and <i>δ</i><sub><i>max</i></sub> between ellipsoidal and spherical rockfalls through experiments and simulations. The second method, based on Hertz contact theory, the analytical solution including shape parameters is derived. The suggested values of <i>F</i><sub>max</sub> and <i>δ</i><sub><i>max</i></sub> for ellipsoidal rockfalls are given. Verification indicates that new models enable more accurate prediction of <i>F</i><sub>max</sub> and <i>δ</i><sub><i>max</i></sub> for ellipsoidal rockfalls. The results can be applied to the design of protective structures such as shed tunnels, effectively enhancing the accuracy and economy of rockfall disaster prevention and control.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Model for the maximum impact force and penetration depth of ellipsoidal rockfall impacting sand cushion: experimental, numerical and theoretical insights

  • Xiao-Wei Liu,
  • Sheng-Wu Qin,
  • Wen-Di Rao,
  • Jing-Yu Yao,
  • Chao-Biao Zhang,
  • Jiang-Feng Lv

摘要

The maximum impact force (Fmax) and maximum penetration depth (δmax) are critical parameters in the design of rockfall protection structures. Current methods for calculating rockfall impact force often simplify the rockfall as a sphere, thereby neglecting the significant effects of rockfall shape and impact angle, which can lead to estimation inaccuracies. Through experimental and numerical analyses, we demonstrate that the Fmax occurs at a 90° impact angle, with the Fmax of an ellipsoidal rockfall (sphericity = 0.6) being 1.42 times greater than that of a spherical rockfall. Conversely, at a 0° impact angle, the δmax of ellipsoidal rockfall is 1.72 times greater than its spherical rockfall. This phenomenon indicates that calculating impact force by assuming a spherical rockfall shape may underestimate the actual impact force, resulting in inadequate safety of the protective structure. Based on these findings, we propose two innovative calculation methods for evaluating the Fmax and δmax exerted by an ellipsoidal rockfall impacting a sand cushion. The first method proposes the shape magnification coefficient, and establishes the quantitative conversion relationship for Fmax and δmax between ellipsoidal and spherical rockfalls through experiments and simulations. The second method, based on Hertz contact theory, the analytical solution including shape parameters is derived. The suggested values of Fmax and δmax for ellipsoidal rockfalls are given. Verification indicates that new models enable more accurate prediction of Fmax and δmax for ellipsoidal rockfalls. The results can be applied to the design of protective structures such as shed tunnels, effectively enhancing the accuracy and economy of rockfall disaster prevention and control.