Scholarlink

Background <p>Abdominal binders are commonly prescribed after abdominal surgery and hernia repair despite limited evidence supporting their mechanical effectiveness. Elastic abdominal binders and semi-rigid corsets are frequently used interchangeably, although their mechanical behavior under physiologically relevant conditions remains poorly defined.</p> Aim <p>To compare the mechanical behavior of elastic abdominal binders and semi-rigid corsets under patient-applied forces and controlled tensile loading, and to assess their effects on dynamic abdominal circumference and basic respiratory parameters.</p> Methods <p>In this prospective observational study, 67 adult patients were sequentially fitted with two elastic abdominal binders and two semi-rigid corsets. Waist circumference was measured at rest, during voluntary abdominal protrusion, and during abdominal drawing-in, both without and with abdominal supports. Patient-applied fastening forces were recorded using a digital force gauge. Bench-top tensile testing evaluated device elongation under incremental loads up to 70&#xa0;N. Vital capacity and inspiratory capacity were assessed in patients able to perform reproducible spirometry. Paired within-subject analyses were performed.</p> Results <p>Elastic abdominal binders exhibited pronounced elongation within the range of forces applied by patients and did not reach a mechanically stable region, resulting in only a modest reduction in dynamic abdominal circumference when worn. In contrast, semi-rigid corsets demonstrated limited elongation, rapidly entered a stable load–length plateau at relatively low tensile loads, and reduced dynamic abdominal circumference by approximately 50% compared with elastic binders (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Forces required for further elongation were significantly higher for semi-rigid corsets. No clinically relevant differences in vital capacity or inspiratory capacity were observed between support types.</p> Conclusions <p>Elastic abdominal binders and semi-rigid corsets differ fundamentally in mechanical behavior under physiologically relevant loading. Semi-rigid corsets provide superior circumferential stabilization without impairing basic respiratory function. Mechanical properties should be considered when prescribing abdominal supports, as device category alone is insufficient to predict functional stabilization.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Mechanical behavior of elastic abdominal binders and semi-rigid corsets under patient-applied forces and physiologically relevant loading

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月17日

查看全文
  • Kryspin Mitura,
  • Małgorzata Pajer,
  • Laura Kacprzak,
  • Piotr Niecikowski,
  • Marta Wojcik,
  • Lidia Mitura,
  • Orest Lerchuk,
  • Volodymyr Khomyak,
  • Orest Chemerys,
  • Katarzyna Antosik

摘要

Background

Abdominal binders are commonly prescribed after abdominal surgery and hernia repair despite limited evidence supporting their mechanical effectiveness. Elastic abdominal binders and semi-rigid corsets are frequently used interchangeably, although their mechanical behavior under physiologically relevant conditions remains poorly defined.

Aim

To compare the mechanical behavior of elastic abdominal binders and semi-rigid corsets under patient-applied forces and controlled tensile loading, and to assess their effects on dynamic abdominal circumference and basic respiratory parameters.

Methods

In this prospective observational study, 67 adult patients were sequentially fitted with two elastic abdominal binders and two semi-rigid corsets. Waist circumference was measured at rest, during voluntary abdominal protrusion, and during abdominal drawing-in, both without and with abdominal supports. Patient-applied fastening forces were recorded using a digital force gauge. Bench-top tensile testing evaluated device elongation under incremental loads up to 70 N. Vital capacity and inspiratory capacity were assessed in patients able to perform reproducible spirometry. Paired within-subject analyses were performed.

Results

Elastic abdominal binders exhibited pronounced elongation within the range of forces applied by patients and did not reach a mechanically stable region, resulting in only a modest reduction in dynamic abdominal circumference when worn. In contrast, semi-rigid corsets demonstrated limited elongation, rapidly entered a stable load–length plateau at relatively low tensile loads, and reduced dynamic abdominal circumference by approximately 50% compared with elastic binders (p < 0.001). Forces required for further elongation were significantly higher for semi-rigid corsets. No clinically relevant differences in vital capacity or inspiratory capacity were observed between support types.

Conclusions

Elastic abdominal binders and semi-rigid corsets differ fundamentally in mechanical behavior under physiologically relevant loading. Semi-rigid corsets provide superior circumferential stabilization without impairing basic respiratory function. Mechanical properties should be considered when prescribing abdominal supports, as device category alone is insufficient to predict functional stabilization.