Context <p>The interfacial interactions between energetic filler crystals, metallic fuels, and polymer binders govern the mechanical integrity, processing characteristics, and safety performance of polymer-bonded explosives (PBXs). Despite extensive prior investigations of individual binary interfaces, a systematic comparative dataset spanning all three interface classes under a unified computational protocol has not been available, and the effect of alloying additions to aluminum fuels on interfacial adhesion remains unexplored. To address these gaps, molecular dynamics simulations were performed to comprehensively characterize interfacial adhesion and mechanical properties across 23 binary material combinations involving <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varepsilon \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>ε</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-hexanitrohexaazaisowurtzitane (CL-20), three metallic phases (Al, Al–2.5 at.% Li, Al–5.0 at.% B), and five polymer binders (fluororubber F2603, butadiene rubber BR, ethylene–vinyl acetate EVA, ethylene–propylene–diene monomer EPDM, and microcrystalline wax). The results reveal a three-tier hierarchy of interfacial interaction strength: metal/wax interfaces exhibit the strongest cohesion (cohesive energy density &gt; 4.5 <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\times \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>×</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> 10<InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{9}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>9</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> kJ<InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\cdot \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>·</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>cm<InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{-3}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>), dominated by van der Waals forces; CL-20/metal interfaces show intermediate binding (<InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\sim \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>∼</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>1.8 <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\times \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>×</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> 10<InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{9}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>9</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> kJ<InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\cdot \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>·</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>cm<InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{-3}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) with mixed van der Waals–electrostatic character; and CL-20/polymer interfaces represent the mechanically weakest links (&lt; 6.2 <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\times \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>×</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> 10<InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{8}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>8</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> kJ<InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\cdot \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>·</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>cm<InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{-3}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>). Alloying aluminum with Li or B produced no significant enhancement in interfacial adhesion compared to pure Al. Among polymer binders, EVA exhibited the optimal balance of CL-20 interfacial adhesion and composite stiffness, while EPDM offered superior ductility.</p> Methods <p>All molecular dynamics simulations employed the COMPASS III force field as implemented in the Forcite Plus module of Materials Studio 2023 (BIOVIA, Dassault Systèmes). Interface models were constructed using the Build Layers tool with a <InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varvec{6 \times 6 \times 3}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn mathvariant="bold">6</mn> <mo mathvariant="bold">×</mo> <mn mathvariant="bold">6</mn> <mo mathvariant="bold">×</mo> <mn mathvariant="bold">3</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> Al supercell and a <InlineEquation ID="IEq16"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varvec{2 \times 2 \times 3}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn mathvariant="bold">2</mn> <mo mathvariant="bold">×</mo> <mn mathvariant="bold">2</mn> <mo mathvariant="bold">×</mo> <mn mathvariant="bold">3</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> <InlineEquation ID="IEq17"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varepsilon \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>ε</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-CL-20 supercell. Each model was geometry-optimized (convergence threshold <InlineEquation ID="IEq18"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varvec{1 \times 10^{-4}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn mathvariant="bold">1</mn> <mo mathvariant="bold">×</mo> <msup> <mn mathvariant="bold">10</mn> <mrow> <mo mathvariant="bold">-</mo> <mn mathvariant="bold">4</mn> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> kcal<InlineEquation ID="IEq19"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\cdot \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>·</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>mol<InlineEquation ID="IEq20"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varvec{^{-1}\cdot }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mrow> <mo mathvariant="bold">-</mo> <mn mathvariant="bold">1</mn> </mrow> </mmultiscripts> <mo mathvariant="bold">·</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>Å<InlineEquation ID="IEq21"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varvec{^{-1}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mrow> <mo mathvariant="bold">-</mo> <mn mathvariant="bold">1</mn> </mrow> </mmultiscripts> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) and equilibrated under NVT ensemble conditions at 295 K for 500 ps. Cohesive energy density with van der Waals and electrostatic decomposition, binding energy, and mechanical properties—including elastic modulus, bulk modulus, shear modulus, Poisson’s ratio, and the <InlineEquation ID="IEq22"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\varvec{C_{12}-C_{44}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">C</mi> <mn mathvariant="bold">12</mn> </msub> <mo mathvariant="bold">-</mo> <msub> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">C</mi> <mn mathvariant="bold">44</mn> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> anisotropy index calculated via the Voigt–Reuss–Hill approximation—were computed for all material combinations and averaged over 51 equilibrated trajectory frames.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Interfacial interactions in CL-20/alloy-metal/polymer energetic composites: a molecular dynamics study

  • Hao Wang,
  • Bohan Guo,
  • Yanyan Tan,
  • Yudong Sun,
  • Sen Xu,
  • Ming Lu

摘要

Context

The interfacial interactions between energetic filler crystals, metallic fuels, and polymer binders govern the mechanical integrity, processing characteristics, and safety performance of polymer-bonded explosives (PBXs). Despite extensive prior investigations of individual binary interfaces, a systematic comparative dataset spanning all three interface classes under a unified computational protocol has not been available, and the effect of alloying additions to aluminum fuels on interfacial adhesion remains unexplored. To address these gaps, molecular dynamics simulations were performed to comprehensively characterize interfacial adhesion and mechanical properties across 23 binary material combinations involving \(\varepsilon \) ε -hexanitrohexaazaisowurtzitane (CL-20), three metallic phases (Al, Al–2.5 at.% Li, Al–5.0 at.% B), and five polymer binders (fluororubber F2603, butadiene rubber BR, ethylene–vinyl acetate EVA, ethylene–propylene–diene monomer EPDM, and microcrystalline wax). The results reveal a three-tier hierarchy of interfacial interaction strength: metal/wax interfaces exhibit the strongest cohesion (cohesive energy density > 4.5 \(\times \) × 10 \(^{9}\) 9 kJ \(\cdot \) · cm \(^{-3}\) - 3 ), dominated by van der Waals forces; CL-20/metal interfaces show intermediate binding ( \(\sim \) 1.8 \(\times \) × 10 \(^{9}\) 9 kJ \(\cdot \) · cm \(^{-3}\) - 3 ) with mixed van der Waals–electrostatic character; and CL-20/polymer interfaces represent the mechanically weakest links (< 6.2 \(\times \) × 10 \(^{8}\) 8 kJ \(\cdot \) · cm \(^{-3}\) - 3 ). Alloying aluminum with Li or B produced no significant enhancement in interfacial adhesion compared to pure Al. Among polymer binders, EVA exhibited the optimal balance of CL-20 interfacial adhesion and composite stiffness, while EPDM offered superior ductility.

Methods

All molecular dynamics simulations employed the COMPASS III force field as implemented in the Forcite Plus module of Materials Studio 2023 (BIOVIA, Dassault Systèmes). Interface models were constructed using the Build Layers tool with a \(\varvec{6 \times 6 \times 3}\) 6 × 6 × 3 Al supercell and a \(\varvec{2 \times 2 \times 3}\) 2 × 2 × 3 \(\varepsilon \) ε -CL-20 supercell. Each model was geometry-optimized (convergence threshold \(\varvec{1 \times 10^{-4}}\) 1 × 10 - 4 kcal \(\cdot \) · mol \(\varvec{^{-1}\cdot }\) - 1 · Å \(\varvec{^{-1}}\) - 1 ) and equilibrated under NVT ensemble conditions at 295 K for 500 ps. Cohesive energy density with van der Waals and electrostatic decomposition, binding energy, and mechanical properties—including elastic modulus, bulk modulus, shear modulus, Poisson’s ratio, and the \(\varvec{C_{12}-C_{44}}\) C 12 - C 44 anisotropy index calculated via the Voigt–Reuss–Hill approximation—were computed for all material combinations and averaged over 51 equilibrated trajectory frames.