Context <p>Since various interaction energy partitioning schemes yield different, basis-set-dependent components, we have analyzed several of them here using a wide range of even-tempered regularized basis sets reaching the Hartree-Fock limit. These results were subsequently compared with benchmark data generated by Symmetry-Adapted Perturbation Theory (SAPT). Our findings regarding the controversial polarization or charge-transfer term equivalents indicate that the delocalization <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(E^{\textrm{HVPT}}_{\textrm{del}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msubsup> <mi>E</mi> <mtext>del</mtext> <mtext>HVPT</mtext> </msubsup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> term defined within Hybrid Variation-Perturbation Theory (HVPT) and the polarization <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(E^{\textrm{LMOEDA}}_{\textrm{pol}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msubsup> <mi>E</mi> <mtext>pol</mtext> <mtext>LMOEDA</mtext> </msubsup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> term in Localized Molecular Orbital Energy Decomposition (LMOEDA) coincide with the corresponding <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(E^{\mathrm {(20)}}_{\textrm{ind,resp}} + E^{\mathrm {(20)}}_{\mathrm {exch\text {-}ind,resp}} + \delta E^{\textrm{HF}}_{\textrm{int,resp}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>E</mi> <mtext>ind,resp</mtext> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>20</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> <mo>+</mo> <msubsup> <mi>E</mi> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">exch</mi> <mtext>-</mtext> <mi mathvariant="normal">ind</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">resp</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>20</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> <mo>+</mo> <mi>δ</mi> <msubsup> <mi>E</mi> <mtext>int,resp</mtext> <mtext>HF</mtext> </msubsup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> SAPT terms, saturating rapidly as the basis set size increases. In contrast, other charge-transfer terms—specifically <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(E^{\textrm{KM}}_{\textrm{ct}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msubsup> <mi>E</mi> <mtext>ct</mtext> <mtext>KM</mtext> </msubsup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> from the Kitaura–Morokuma scheme, <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(E^{\textrm{RVS}}_{\textrm{ct}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msubsup> <mi>E</mi> <mtext>ct</mtext> <mtext>RVS</mtext> </msubsup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> from the Reduced Variational Space (RVS) method, and <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(E^{\textrm{ALMO}}_{\textrm{CT}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msubsup> <mi>E</mi> <mtext>CT</mtext> <mtext>ALMO</mtext> </msubsup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> from the Absolutely Localized Molecular Orbitals (ALMO)—exhibit a much higher sensitivity to the basis set choice and tend to vanish in the large-basis-set limit. In addition, the ratio of the delocalization to electrostatic terms, <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(E_{\textrm{del}}^{\textrm{HVPT}}/E_{\textrm{el}}^{\textrm{HVPT}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>E</mi> <mrow> <mtext>del</mtext> </mrow> <mtext>HVPT</mtext> </msubsup> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <msubsup> <mi>E</mi> <mrow> <mtext>el</mtext> </mrow> <mtext>HVPT</mtext> </msubsup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, has been employed here to quantitatively analyze the potential covalent nature of the interactions within the active site of triosephosphate isomerase, aiming to evaluate the Zhang and Houk hypothesis, which attributes the catalytic power of extremely efficient enzymes to the covalent binding of the transition state.</p> Methods <p>SAPT calculations were performed using the MOLPRO package, whereas the HVPT, RVS, Kitaura–Morokuma, and LMOEDA results were generated using GAMESS (US). The ALMO interaction energy components were obtained using the Q-Chem software. Exponents for the s-type even-tempered regularized basis sets were generated according to the Schmidt–Ruedenberg scheme.</p> Graphical abstract <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Interaction energy decomposition methods: comparison and application to covalent interaction assessment

  • Edyta Dyguda-Kazimierowicz,
  • Paweł Kędzierski,
  • W. Andrzej Sokalski

摘要

Context

Since various interaction energy partitioning schemes yield different, basis-set-dependent components, we have analyzed several of them here using a wide range of even-tempered regularized basis sets reaching the Hartree-Fock limit. These results were subsequently compared with benchmark data generated by Symmetry-Adapted Perturbation Theory (SAPT). Our findings regarding the controversial polarization or charge-transfer term equivalents indicate that the delocalization \(E^{\textrm{HVPT}}_{\textrm{del}}\) E del HVPT term defined within Hybrid Variation-Perturbation Theory (HVPT) and the polarization \(E^{\textrm{LMOEDA}}_{\textrm{pol}}\) E pol LMOEDA term in Localized Molecular Orbital Energy Decomposition (LMOEDA) coincide with the corresponding \(E^{\mathrm {(20)}}_{\textrm{ind,resp}} + E^{\mathrm {(20)}}_{\mathrm {exch\text {-}ind,resp}} + \delta E^{\textrm{HF}}_{\textrm{int,resp}}\) E ind,resp ( 20 ) + E exch - ind , resp ( 20 ) + δ E int,resp HF SAPT terms, saturating rapidly as the basis set size increases. In contrast, other charge-transfer terms—specifically \(E^{\textrm{KM}}_{\textrm{ct}}\) E ct KM from the Kitaura–Morokuma scheme, \(E^{\textrm{RVS}}_{\textrm{ct}}\) E ct RVS from the Reduced Variational Space (RVS) method, and \(E^{\textrm{ALMO}}_{\textrm{CT}}\) E CT ALMO from the Absolutely Localized Molecular Orbitals (ALMO)—exhibit a much higher sensitivity to the basis set choice and tend to vanish in the large-basis-set limit. In addition, the ratio of the delocalization to electrostatic terms, \(E_{\textrm{del}}^{\textrm{HVPT}}/E_{\textrm{el}}^{\textrm{HVPT}}\) E del HVPT / E el HVPT , has been employed here to quantitatively analyze the potential covalent nature of the interactions within the active site of triosephosphate isomerase, aiming to evaluate the Zhang and Houk hypothesis, which attributes the catalytic power of extremely efficient enzymes to the covalent binding of the transition state.

Methods

SAPT calculations were performed using the MOLPRO package, whereas the HVPT, RVS, Kitaura–Morokuma, and LMOEDA results were generated using GAMESS (US). The ALMO interaction energy components were obtained using the Q-Chem software. Exponents for the s-type even-tempered regularized basis sets were generated according to the Schmidt–Ruedenberg scheme.

Graphical abstract