Scholarlink

Objectives <p>To evaluate the relationship between gingival phenotype, classified using a steel periodontal probe (TRAN method), and soft tissue dimensions measured clinically and histologically.</p> Materials and methods <p>Forty-five healthy volunteers were categorized into thin or thick phenotype groups based on gingival transparency at one maxillary central incisor. Clinical thickness measurements of the gingiva and mucosa were taken with an ultrasonic device, while histological assessments were conducted on tissue samples from the same region. The keratinized tissue width (KTW) was also recorded.</p> Results <p>Twenty-four participants were classified as thick phenotype and twenty-one as thin. Phenotype showed a significant moderate correlation with clinical gingival thickness (<i>r</i> = 0.682, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), a weaker positive correlation with KTW (<i>r</i> = 0.290, <i>p</i> = 0.023). The optimal threshold for distinguishing thin and thick phenotypes was 1.065&#xa0;mm, with the TRAN method showing good predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.912). Both clinical and histological measurements revealed a gradual thinning of soft tissues from the midpoint of the keratinized tissue to the MGJ and beyond. Ultrasonography demonstrated good repeatability for gingival thickness (ICC = 0.744) but underestimated mucosal thickness compared to histology (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p> Conclusions <p>The TRAN method moderately correlates with clinical gingival thickness at the midpoint of KTW and with KTW. Soft tissue thickness decreases towards the MGJ.</p> Clinical relevance <p>Probe concealment correlates with a gingival thickness of 1.065&#xa0;mm at the midpoint of the KTW. Ultrasonography is reliable for gingival, but not mucosal, thickness assessment.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Gingival phenotypes and dimensions of the soft periodontal tissues: a cross-sectional clinical and histological study

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月11日

查看全文
  • Dimitrios Papapetros,
  • Karin Nylander,
  • Sotirios Kalfas

摘要

Objectives

To evaluate the relationship between gingival phenotype, classified using a steel periodontal probe (TRAN method), and soft tissue dimensions measured clinically and histologically.

Materials and methods

Forty-five healthy volunteers were categorized into thin or thick phenotype groups based on gingival transparency at one maxillary central incisor. Clinical thickness measurements of the gingiva and mucosa were taken with an ultrasonic device, while histological assessments were conducted on tissue samples from the same region. The keratinized tissue width (KTW) was also recorded.

Results

Twenty-four participants were classified as thick phenotype and twenty-one as thin. Phenotype showed a significant moderate correlation with clinical gingival thickness (r = 0.682, p < 0.001), a weaker positive correlation with KTW (r = 0.290, p = 0.023). The optimal threshold for distinguishing thin and thick phenotypes was 1.065 mm, with the TRAN method showing good predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.912). Both clinical and histological measurements revealed a gradual thinning of soft tissues from the midpoint of the keratinized tissue to the MGJ and beyond. Ultrasonography demonstrated good repeatability for gingival thickness (ICC = 0.744) but underestimated mucosal thickness compared to histology (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The TRAN method moderately correlates with clinical gingival thickness at the midpoint of KTW and with KTW. Soft tissue thickness decreases towards the MGJ.

Clinical relevance

Probe concealment correlates with a gingival thickness of 1.065 mm at the midpoint of the KTW. Ultrasonography is reliable for gingival, but not mucosal, thickness assessment.