Scholarlink

Background and aim <p>Patients with statutory health insurance (SHI) in Germany must undergo an assessment of orthodontic treatment need using the KIG classification system since 2002. Recent studies have shown that the prevalence of anomalies is not homogeneous when categorised according to patient age at treatment begin. The aim of this study was to analyse the KIG classifications over a period of 20 years to determine whether there is also a gender-specific prevalence.</p> Patients and methods <p>Between 2002 and 2021, <i>n</i> = 4940 statutorily insured patients before the age of 18 presented themselves for an orthodontic consultation. Out of these, <i>n</i> = 3701 showed a treatment indication according to current SHI guidelines. The KIG classification was based on the highest existing KIG grade observed in these patients without multiple classifications. The patient cohort was then divided into 3 groups according to gender and chronological age, representing early (PG 1), main (PG 2) and late (PG 3) treatment.</p> Results <p><i>N</i> = 1934 (52.2%, mean age 11.00 ± 2.28 years) of the patients were female, <i>n</i> = 1767 (47.8%, mean age 11.44 ± 2.23 years) male. Out of those, <i>n</i> = 1109 and thus 30.0% of the total collective had the KIG classification D and 43.1% (<i>n</i> = 1595) combined sagittal classifications D + M. Regarding treatment period, the classification K was the most frequent in PG 1, D in PG 2 and E in PG 3 for both genders, and the combination D + M in all groups. Regarding the age at treatment begin, there were different peak values for males and females. Females reached D + M, O + T, B + K and E + P as well as the KIG classifications D, M, O, T, B and K earlier than males, but even age distributions occurred for E and P. The percentage gender distribution in the various age groups showed the opposite trend: In females, there was a decrease in PG 3 compared to PG 1 for all 4 KIG combinations and for 7 of 8 individual anomalies, while it was vice versa in males.</p> Conclusions <p>This study was the first to analyse the KIG classification for gender-specific differences and their possible age dependency over a period of 20 years and confirms that the distribution of KIG classifications requiring treatment is not homogeneous, but age-and gender-dependent.</p> Clinical relevance <p>The study results on gender- and age-specific differences in the KIG classification can be regarded as a step towards personalised medicine in orthodontics.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Gender- and age-dependent prevalence of malocclusions requiring orthodontic treatment according to the KIG classification. A cross-sectional study over a 20-year-period from the district of Viersen/North rhine

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月13日

查看全文
  • Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger,
  • Jan Hourfar,
  • JörgAlexander Lisson

摘要

Background and aim

Patients with statutory health insurance (SHI) in Germany must undergo an assessment of orthodontic treatment need using the KIG classification system since 2002. Recent studies have shown that the prevalence of anomalies is not homogeneous when categorised according to patient age at treatment begin. The aim of this study was to analyse the KIG classifications over a period of 20 years to determine whether there is also a gender-specific prevalence.

Patients and methods

Between 2002 and 2021, n = 4940 statutorily insured patients before the age of 18 presented themselves for an orthodontic consultation. Out of these, n = 3701 showed a treatment indication according to current SHI guidelines. The KIG classification was based on the highest existing KIG grade observed in these patients without multiple classifications. The patient cohort was then divided into 3 groups according to gender and chronological age, representing early (PG 1), main (PG 2) and late (PG 3) treatment.

Results

N = 1934 (52.2%, mean age 11.00 ± 2.28 years) of the patients were female, n = 1767 (47.8%, mean age 11.44 ± 2.23 years) male. Out of those, n = 1109 and thus 30.0% of the total collective had the KIG classification D and 43.1% (n = 1595) combined sagittal classifications D + M. Regarding treatment period, the classification K was the most frequent in PG 1, D in PG 2 and E in PG 3 for both genders, and the combination D + M in all groups. Regarding the age at treatment begin, there were different peak values for males and females. Females reached D + M, O + T, B + K and E + P as well as the KIG classifications D, M, O, T, B and K earlier than males, but even age distributions occurred for E and P. The percentage gender distribution in the various age groups showed the opposite trend: In females, there was a decrease in PG 3 compared to PG 1 for all 4 KIG combinations and for 7 of 8 individual anomalies, while it was vice versa in males.

Conclusions

This study was the first to analyse the KIG classification for gender-specific differences and their possible age dependency over a period of 20 years and confirms that the distribution of KIG classifications requiring treatment is not homogeneous, but age-and gender-dependent.

Clinical relevance

The study results on gender- and age-specific differences in the KIG classification can be regarded as a step towards personalised medicine in orthodontics.