Scholarlink

Objectives <p>This prospective observational study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and impact of different treatment protocols - immediate loading using a round gold bar retained overdenture on two implants, submucosal healing, and transmucosal healing - on circumferential marginal bone levels around dental implants.</p> Materials and methods <p>20 patients requiring six implants in the edentulous lower jaw were included. Within each patient, 2 implants were assigned to submucosal healing, transmucosal healing, or immediate loading protocols. Marginal bone loss (MBL) was evaluated using 3D scanning at implant placement and after 4 months while raising a full-thickness flap. Periotest values (PTVs), the oral health impact profile (OHIP-14) and regular clinical evaluations were conducted for up to 2 years.</p> Results <p>The submucosal group exhibited the least mean vertical MBL (-0.22&#xa0;mm), significantly lower than the immediate (-0.39&#xa0;mm) and transmucosal (-0.36&#xa0;mm) groups (<i>P</i> = .001). Peri-implant bone surface area reduction was lowest in the submucosal group (-0.87&#xa0;mm²) compared to the transmucosal (-4.58&#xa0;mm²) and immediate (-6.66&#xa0;mm²) protocols (<i>P</i> = .002). One submucosal healed implant and two immediately loaded implants were lost. Immediate loading provided high patient comfort and demonstrated successful outcomes both in terms of clinical data (PTVs, MBL) and patient-reported outcome measures (OHIP-14, VAS).</p> Conclusions <p>Submucosal and transmucosal healing protocols resulted in better marginal bone preservation compared to immediate loading. Although immediate loading enhanced patient comfort, it was associated with higher marginal bone loss.</p> Clinical relevance <p>This study highlights the potential advantages of submucosal healing for marginal bone preservation and supports the use of three-dimensional scanning for precise bone loss evaluation, guiding clinical decision-making in implantology.</p> Trial registration <p>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06408506.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

In-patient comparison of marginal bone loss after 4 months in immediately loaded, submucosal, and transmucosal dental implants using 3D scanning: a prospective clinical trial

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年3月17日

查看全文
  • Armin Sokolowski,
  • Martin Lorenzoni,
  • Elisabeth Steyer,
  • Felix Marschner,
  • Anke Pichler,
  • Alwin Sokolowski

摘要

Objectives

This prospective observational study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and impact of different treatment protocols - immediate loading using a round gold bar retained overdenture on two implants, submucosal healing, and transmucosal healing - on circumferential marginal bone levels around dental implants.

Materials and methods

20 patients requiring six implants in the edentulous lower jaw were included. Within each patient, 2 implants were assigned to submucosal healing, transmucosal healing, or immediate loading protocols. Marginal bone loss (MBL) was evaluated using 3D scanning at implant placement and after 4 months while raising a full-thickness flap. Periotest values (PTVs), the oral health impact profile (OHIP-14) and regular clinical evaluations were conducted for up to 2 years.

Results

The submucosal group exhibited the least mean vertical MBL (-0.22 mm), significantly lower than the immediate (-0.39 mm) and transmucosal (-0.36 mm) groups (P = .001). Peri-implant bone surface area reduction was lowest in the submucosal group (-0.87 mm²) compared to the transmucosal (-4.58 mm²) and immediate (-6.66 mm²) protocols (P = .002). One submucosal healed implant and two immediately loaded implants were lost. Immediate loading provided high patient comfort and demonstrated successful outcomes both in terms of clinical data (PTVs, MBL) and patient-reported outcome measures (OHIP-14, VAS).

Conclusions

Submucosal and transmucosal healing protocols resulted in better marginal bone preservation compared to immediate loading. Although immediate loading enhanced patient comfort, it was associated with higher marginal bone loss.

Clinical relevance

This study highlights the potential advantages of submucosal healing for marginal bone preservation and supports the use of three-dimensional scanning for precise bone loss evaluation, guiding clinical decision-making in implantology.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06408506.