错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Influence of CBCT filters and contrast adjustments on peri-implant buccal bone thickness measurement and blooming expression

  • Hugo Nogueira Mello,
  • Eduarda Alberti Bonadiman,
  • Giuliano Lozer Bruneli,
  • Gustavo Azevedo Pitol,
  • Sergio Lins de-Azevedo-Vaz

摘要

Objectives

To assess whether filter and contrast adjustments can improve the accuracy of CBCT in measuring the buccal bone thickness (BBT) adjacent to dental implants by reducing blooming artifacts.

Materials and methods

Homogeneous bone blocks with peri-implant BBT of 0.3 mm, 0.5 mm, and 1 mm were scanned using the Orthophos SL system. Three dentists measured the BBT in 234 CBCT scans under different settings of contrast adjustments and ‘Sharpen’ filter activation. Additionally, implant diameter measurements were taken to assess blooming artifact expression. The differences between tomographic and actual measurements of BBT and implant diameter [(CBCT - actual) * 100 / actual] were subjected to Mixed ANOVA (α = 0.05).

Results

The group with the thinnest BBT (0.3 mm) had the greatest difference between tomographic and actual measurements (79.9% ± 29.0%). Conversely, the 0.5 mm (36.1% ± 38.4%) and 1 mm (29.4% ± 12.3%) groups exhibited lower differences (p < 0.05). ‘Sharpen’ filter activation reduced blooming expression since it resulted in a lower difference for implant diameter (p < 0.05), but it did not influence BBT measurements (p = 0.673). Contrast settings had no impact on BBT (p = 0.054) or implant diameter measurements (p = 0.079).

Conclusion

Although filter activation reduced blooming artifacts, neither filter nor contrast adjustments improved the accuracy of CBCT in measuring peri-implant BBT; actual BBT influenced this task.

Clinical relevance

When assessing the peri-implant buccal bone plate in the CBCT system studied, dental surgeons may find it beneficial to adjust contrast and apply filters according to their preferences, since such adjustments were found to have no adverse effects on the diagnostic accuracy of this task. The use of the ‘Sharpen’ filter may lead to improved representation of implant dimensions.