Introduction <p>Although bone anabolic agents such as teriparatide are effective for osteoporosis, satisfaction and adherence may vary by regimen. This multicenter study assessed long-term satisfaction, persistence, efficacy, and safety in postmenopausal women with primary osteoporosis treated with alternating daily and twice-weekly teriparatide over 52 weeks, followed by a final free-choice treatment period.</p> Materials and methods <p>In a randomized, open-label, crossover study, 358 postmenopausal women at high risk for fracture were assigned to receive once-daily (20 µg) or twice-weekly (28.2 µg) subcutaneous teriparatide for 26 weeks, then crossed over to the alternative regimen for another 26 weeks. Afterwards, 233 patients entered a 52-week free-choice period under their preferred regimen.</p> Results <p>Among the 233 patients entering the free-choice period, 162 chose twice-weekly and 71 chose daily teriparatide. Persistence at 104 weeks was 90.1% for twice-weekly and 88.7% for daily groups (p = 0.749). Overall and treatment satisfaction between groups did not differ significantly at 104 weeks (p &gt; 0.05). Fracture incidence was low and similar (2.8% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.758). Patients in both groups showed significant increases in bone mineral density at L2–L4 and the femoral neck (p &lt; 0.05). Adverse events were infrequent and non-severe.</p> Conclusions <p>Patient satisfaction and efficacy were maintained with both teriparatide regimens over 104 weeks, and persistence improved during the patient-choice phase. Supporting patient preference may improve adherence to osteoporosis medications.</p> Clinical trial registration <p>Japan Registry of Clinical Trials ID: jRCTs031210187.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Randomized crossover comparison of two teriparatide self-injection regimens for primary osteoporosis: final report of the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial 06 (JOINT-06)

  • Sakae Tanaka,
  • Yukari Uemura,
  • Shiro Tanaka,
  • Yasuhiro Takeuchi,
  • Naoto Endo,
  • Junichi Takada,
  • Satoshi Ikeda,
  • Jun Iwamoto,
  • Nobukazu Okimoto,
  • Satoshi Soen

摘要

Introduction

Although bone anabolic agents such as teriparatide are effective for osteoporosis, satisfaction and adherence may vary by regimen. This multicenter study assessed long-term satisfaction, persistence, efficacy, and safety in postmenopausal women with primary osteoporosis treated with alternating daily and twice-weekly teriparatide over 52 weeks, followed by a final free-choice treatment period.

Materials and methods

In a randomized, open-label, crossover study, 358 postmenopausal women at high risk for fracture were assigned to receive once-daily (20 µg) or twice-weekly (28.2 µg) subcutaneous teriparatide for 26 weeks, then crossed over to the alternative regimen for another 26 weeks. Afterwards, 233 patients entered a 52-week free-choice period under their preferred regimen.

Results

Among the 233 patients entering the free-choice period, 162 chose twice-weekly and 71 chose daily teriparatide. Persistence at 104 weeks was 90.1% for twice-weekly and 88.7% for daily groups (p = 0.749). Overall and treatment satisfaction between groups did not differ significantly at 104 weeks (p > 0.05). Fracture incidence was low and similar (2.8% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.758). Patients in both groups showed significant increases in bone mineral density at L2–L4 and the femoral neck (p < 0.05). Adverse events were infrequent and non-severe.

Conclusions

Patient satisfaction and efficacy were maintained with both teriparatide regimens over 104 weeks, and persistence improved during the patient-choice phase. Supporting patient preference may improve adherence to osteoporosis medications.

Clinical trial registration

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials ID: jRCTs031210187.