错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Therapiepräferenzen und Behandlungswünsche von Patient*innen mit Ösophaguskarzinom – ausgewählte Ergebnisse einer quantitativen Pilotstudie

  • Nathalie Dammer,
  • Julian Hipp,
  • Claudia Schmoor,
  • Felix Nickel,
  • Peter P. Grimminger,
  • Christiane Bruns,
  • Gunthard Kissinger,
  • Jens Hoeppner,
  • Joachim Weis

摘要

Background

The standard treatment for most patients with nonmetastatic esophageal cancer (EC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or radiochemotherapy (nCRT) is surgery. For patients with clinically complete response to neoadjuvant therapy, active surveillance with surgery as needed may be an equivalent option in terms of survival.

Research questions

In order to be able to offer patients comprehensive patient-centered information in a planned randomized controlled trial (RCT), the motives and fears/hopes of esophageal cancer (EC) patients regarding the choice of the two treatment options are investigated and factors influencing the acceptance of randomization are identified.

Materials and methods

The pilot study was conducted in the form of a multicenter quantitative questionnaire survey administering the Preference and Decision Aid Questionnaire (PDAQ) to patients with EC. In addition, sociodemographic and psychosocial factors were evaluated in the PDAQ using standardized instruments to record anxiety (GAD7), depressive symptoms (PHQ 9), fear of progression (PA-F-KF), quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL), and esophageal cancer-specific symptoms of the patients (EORTC QLQ-OES18). A total of 73 patients were recruited at five study centers.

Results

Avoiding surgery and maintaining quality of life are the most important reasons for surgery if needed. The impairment of quality of life is also seen as one of the main reasons against immediate surgery. The key argument for immediate surgery is the feeling of mental relief and a subjective reassurance provided by surgical removal of the tumor.

Conclusion

The results provide indications of patients’ preferences and fears regarding the two treatment options and contribute to the development of recommendations for patient-centered information material, which are helpful to improve patient-centered education in the main study and therefore reduce dropout rates in the following RCT.