错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Treatment of adult spine deformity: A retrospective comparison of bone morphogenic protein and bone marrow aspirate with bone allograft

  • Oluwatobi O. Onafowokan,
  • Akachimere C. Uzosike,
  • Abhinav Sharma,
  • Matthew Galetta,
  • Nathan Lorentz,
  • Samuel Montgomery,
  • Max R. Fisher,
  • Anthony Yung,
  • Paritash Tahmasebpour,
  • Lauren Seo,
  • Timothy Roberts,
  • Renaud Lafage,
  • Justin Smith,
  • Pawel P. Jankowski,
  • Zeeshan M. Sardar,
  • Christopher I. Shaffrey,
  • Virginie Lafage,
  • Andrew J. Schoenfeld,
  • Peter G. Passias

摘要

Background  

The use of bone morphogenic protein (BMP-2) in adult spine deformity (ASD) surgery remains controversial more than two decades following its approval for clinical application in spine surgery. This study was performed to assess outcomes in patients undergoing ASD surgery with BMP application compared with a combination of bone marrow aspirate, cancellous bone chips and i-Factor.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study. ASD patients were stratified by use of intra-operative BMP (BMP +) or not (BMA + I) and surveyed for the development of complications and mechanical failure. Quality of life gained following the procedure was evaluated using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Cost was calculated using the PearlDiver database and CMS definitions. Multivariable analyses (ANCOVA) and logistic regression were used to adjust for confounding.

Results

512 patients were included (60% BMP +). At baseline, BMP + patients were older (62.5 vs 60.8 years, p < 0.010). Radiographic and quality-of-life metrics did not differ at follow up timepoints (all p > 0.05). BMP use was associated with higher supplemental rod use (OR: 7.0, 1.9 – 26.2, p = 0.004), greater number of levels fused (OR: 1.1, 1.03 – 1.17, p = 0.003) and greater neurological complications (OR: 5.0, 1.3 – 18.7, p = 0.017). Controlling for rod use and levels fused, BMP use was not associated with a lower risk of mechanical complications (OR 0.3, 95% CI: 0.2 – 3.0, p = 0.353), rod breakage (OR: 3.3, 0.6 – 18.7, p = 0.182) or implant failure (OR: 0.3, 0.04 – 1.51). At 2 years, the BMP + cohort exhibited higher overall costs ($108,062 vs $95,144, p = 0.002), comparable QALYs (0.163 vs 0.171, p = 0.65) and higher cost per QALY (p = 0.001) at two years.

Conclusions

In this analysis, BMP-2 application was not associated with superior outcomes when compared to a less costly biologic alternative (bone marrow aspirate + cancellous bone chips + i-Factor) following ASD surgery. The use of BMP-2 in ASD surgery appears to have reduced cost-efficacy at two years postoperatively.