<p>Rockbursts are often sudden and random, and they negatively affect the construction of tunnels and mines, creating unsafe conditions. Accurately predicting rockburst intensity is critical for disaster prevention and control and to ensure safety in underground spaces. Predicting rockbursts with traditional machine learning methods has become increasingly common; however, black-box effects limit the interpretability of the prediction mechanism. This study proposes a novel rockburst prediction method that combines a multistrategy improved optimization (quantum computation and good point sets and harmonizing sand cat swarm optimization (QGHSCSO)) with the CatBoost model. An interpretable technique (Shapley additive explanations (SHAPs)) is introduced to decipher the black-box effect of the QGHSCSO-CatBoost model, revealing the algorithm’s prediction mechanism. A comprehensive and multiangle performance comparison analysis is conducted with the whale optimization algorithm (WOA), northern goshawk optimization (NGO), and Harris hawk optimization (HHO) algorithms, using 10 test functions to verify the robustness and convergence of the QGHSCSO algorithm. The contributions of input factors to the prediction results are evaluated via a SHAP analysis. The results indicate that model classification predictions are governed by the elastic deformation energy coefficient (<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({W}_{\text{et}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>W</mi> <mtext>et</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>), particularly in intense rockbursts. The rock stress coefficient (<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\sigma }_{\uptheta }/{\sigma }_{\text{c}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>σ</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">θ</mi> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <msub> <mi>σ</mi> <mtext>c</mtext> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) and rock brittleness coefficient (<InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\sigma }_{\text{c}}/{\sigma }_{\text{t}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>σ</mi> <mtext>c</mtext> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <msub> <mi>σ</mi> <mtext>t</mtext> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) have minor SHAP contributions, indicating that they serve as supporting factors in low-to-moderate predictions. The QGHSCSO-CatBoost model, based on interpretable techniques, provides accurate and stable rockburst prediction (prediction accuracies of 90.74% for the test set); therefore, the QGHSCSO-CatBoost algorithm is a feasible approach for rockburst intensity prediction.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Model Interpretability and Intensity Prediction of Rockbursts Using a Method Innovation Based on the QGHSCSO-CatBoost Algorithm

  • Mingtian Zhang,
  • Jialin Zhang,
  • Jinyang Fan,
  • Zongze Li,
  • Jie Chen,
  • Yang Zou,
  • Deyi Jiang,
  • Daniel Nelias

摘要

Rockbursts are often sudden and random, and they negatively affect the construction of tunnels and mines, creating unsafe conditions. Accurately predicting rockburst intensity is critical for disaster prevention and control and to ensure safety in underground spaces. Predicting rockbursts with traditional machine learning methods has become increasingly common; however, black-box effects limit the interpretability of the prediction mechanism. This study proposes a novel rockburst prediction method that combines a multistrategy improved optimization (quantum computation and good point sets and harmonizing sand cat swarm optimization (QGHSCSO)) with the CatBoost model. An interpretable technique (Shapley additive explanations (SHAPs)) is introduced to decipher the black-box effect of the QGHSCSO-CatBoost model, revealing the algorithm’s prediction mechanism. A comprehensive and multiangle performance comparison analysis is conducted with the whale optimization algorithm (WOA), northern goshawk optimization (NGO), and Harris hawk optimization (HHO) algorithms, using 10 test functions to verify the robustness and convergence of the QGHSCSO algorithm. The contributions of input factors to the prediction results are evaluated via a SHAP analysis. The results indicate that model classification predictions are governed by the elastic deformation energy coefficient ( \({W}_{\text{et}}\) W et ), particularly in intense rockbursts. The rock stress coefficient ( \({\sigma }_{\uptheta }/{\sigma }_{\text{c}}\) σ θ / σ c ) and rock brittleness coefficient ( \({\sigma }_{\text{c}}/{\sigma }_{\text{t}}\) σ c / σ t ) have minor SHAP contributions, indicating that they serve as supporting factors in low-to-moderate predictions. The QGHSCSO-CatBoost model, based on interpretable techniques, provides accurate and stable rockburst prediction (prediction accuracies of 90.74% for the test set); therefore, the QGHSCSO-CatBoost algorithm is a feasible approach for rockburst intensity prediction.