Scholarlink

Purpose <p>To investigate disparities and problems within surgical training programs in Japan based on the type of host facility.</p> Methods <p>A post hoc analysis of a nationwide questionnaire survey was performed to evaluate program outcomes and working conditions among university hospitals (Group U), a combination of university and community hospitals (Group UC), and community hospitals (Group C).</p> Results <p>A total of 758 respondents were analyzed across Groups U (<i>n</i> = 199), UC (<i>n</i> = 299), and C (<i>n</i> = 260). Groups U and UC had lower satisfaction scores and smaller surgical volumes than Group C. Academic activity and nonsurgical training in Group U were not superior to those in the other groups. Although overtime work did not differ significantly among groups, poorer working conditions, including a lower rate of overtime allowance, more frequent night duties, and a lower annual income, were found in Group U than in the other groups.</p> Conclusion <p>This study revealed disparities and problems in training programs based on the type of host facility. Further improvements in working conditions and educational contexts are expected to help increase satisfaction levels and recruitment of surgical residents in the future.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A nationwide questionnaire survey to investigate facility-based disparities in satisfaction and working conditions of surgical trainees in Japan: university hospitals, community hospitals, and hybrid-type facilities

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年6月26日

查看全文
  • Daisuke Koike,
  • Kosei Takagi,
  • Keisuke Arai,
  • Yoshiyuki Kiyasu,
  • Takashi Kohmura,
  • Chiaki Suda,
  • Shinkichi Takamori,
  • Wataru Takayama,
  • Mai Nakamura,
  • Masayuki Fukumoto,
  • Yoshiko Yamaoka‐Fujikawa,
  • Genki Watanabe,
  • Jun Watanabe,
  • Saseem Poudel,
  • Norihiko Ikeda,
  • Akinobu Taketomi,
  • Mitsue Saito

摘要

Purpose

To investigate disparities and problems within surgical training programs in Japan based on the type of host facility.

Methods

A post hoc analysis of a nationwide questionnaire survey was performed to evaluate program outcomes and working conditions among university hospitals (Group U), a combination of university and community hospitals (Group UC), and community hospitals (Group C).

Results

A total of 758 respondents were analyzed across Groups U (n = 199), UC (n = 299), and C (n = 260). Groups U and UC had lower satisfaction scores and smaller surgical volumes than Group C. Academic activity and nonsurgical training in Group U were not superior to those in the other groups. Although overtime work did not differ significantly among groups, poorer working conditions, including a lower rate of overtime allowance, more frequent night duties, and a lower annual income, were found in Group U than in the other groups.

Conclusion

This study revealed disparities and problems in training programs based on the type of host facility. Further improvements in working conditions and educational contexts are expected to help increase satisfaction levels and recruitment of surgical residents in the future.