Purpose <p>Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) and basal insulin are currently used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as long-acting injectables. In this study, we aimed to compare the cardiovascular (CV) and renal outcomes of GLP-1 RAs and basal insulin treatment in patients with T2DM.</p> Method <p>We conducted a propensity score-matched cohort study of patients from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital institutions between 2013 and 2021. A diverse patient base from multiple centers was enrolled to enhance the applicability of the findings, including patients with T2DM who were prescribed either GLP-1 RAs or basal insulin.</p> Results <p>Over a mean follow-up period of 2.2 years, 10,839 patients were collected (mean age = 54.3 years; 54.2% men). Among the propensity score-matched patients, 45 (2.23%) in the GLP-1 RA group (2,854 patients) and 72 (3.56%) in the basal insulin group (7,985 patients) experienced 3-point major adverse cardiovascular events (3P-MACEs; hazard ratio [HR] 0.68, 95% CI 0.47–0.99, <i>P</i> =.44). Additionally, composite renal outcomes were observed in 237 (11.7%) patients in the GLP-1 RA group and 360 (17.8%) in the basal insulin group (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.59–0.81, <i>P</i> &lt;.001).</p> Conclusions <p>In patients with T2DM, GLP-1 RAs were associated with more favorable cardiovascular and renal outcomes than basal insulin, suggesting that GLP-1 RA treatment may be a preferable option for managing T2DM with a lower risk of CV and renal complications.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists outperform basal insulin in cardiovascular and renal outcomes for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study

  • Tien-Hsing Chen,
  • Chin-Ju Tseng,
  • Yan-Rong Li,
  • Yuan Lin,
  • Dong-Yi Chen,
  • Ning-I Yang,
  • Te-Hsiung Wang,
  • Ming-Jui Hung,
  • Ming-Lung Tsai

摘要

Purpose

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) and basal insulin are currently used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as long-acting injectables. In this study, we aimed to compare the cardiovascular (CV) and renal outcomes of GLP-1 RAs and basal insulin treatment in patients with T2DM.

Method

We conducted a propensity score-matched cohort study of patients from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital institutions between 2013 and 2021. A diverse patient base from multiple centers was enrolled to enhance the applicability of the findings, including patients with T2DM who were prescribed either GLP-1 RAs or basal insulin.

Results

Over a mean follow-up period of 2.2 years, 10,839 patients were collected (mean age = 54.3 years; 54.2% men). Among the propensity score-matched patients, 45 (2.23%) in the GLP-1 RA group (2,854 patients) and 72 (3.56%) in the basal insulin group (7,985 patients) experienced 3-point major adverse cardiovascular events (3P-MACEs; hazard ratio [HR] 0.68, 95% CI 0.47–0.99, P =.44). Additionally, composite renal outcomes were observed in 237 (11.7%) patients in the GLP-1 RA group and 360 (17.8%) in the basal insulin group (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.59–0.81, P <.001).

Conclusions

In patients with T2DM, GLP-1 RAs were associated with more favorable cardiovascular and renal outcomes than basal insulin, suggesting that GLP-1 RA treatment may be a preferable option for managing T2DM with a lower risk of CV and renal complications.