Purpose <p>The objective of this study was to develop and validate a radiographic method to quantify the lumbar apex on calibrated EOS imaging, to compare the anatomical lumbar apex with the rod apex, and to evaluate the impact of pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) on apex location.</p> Methods <p>This retrospective cohort included 53 patients (mean age 52 ± 16 years) with a 2-year follow-up who underwent L4 or L5 PSO with sacral fixation using 40°, 65°, or 90° pre-bent rods. Pre- and immediate postoperative EOS images were assessed to measure spinopelvic parameters and spinal lordosis ratio (SLR). Differences between the lumbar and rod apices (ΔApex<sub>LL–Rod</sub>) and between pre- and postoperative spinal apices (ΔApex<sub>Preop–Postop</sub>) were calculated. Analyses used paired t-tests, ANOVA, and Pearson correlations.</p> Results <p>The lumbar apex was on average 6.1&#xa0;mm (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) higher than the rod apex. PSO induced a significant distal migration of the spinal apex of − 28.6&#xa0;mm (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). SLR increased by 92.7% postoperatively (<i>p</i> = 0.05). No significant subgroup differences for both ΔApex were found. Both ΔApex values correlated significantly with preoperative pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, lumbar lordosis, and SLR. Reproducibility was excellent, with ICC values over 0.87.</p> Conclusions <p>The spinal apex lies on average higher than the rod apex, and PSO induces a marked distal migration of the anatomical apex. Combined with SLR, apex analysis refines the description of early postoperative sagittal construct geometry. Clinically meaningful thresholds and associations with longer-term outcomes (mechanical events, radiographic maintenance, and PROMs) remain unknown and require longitudinal validation.</p> Study design <p>Retrospective, single-center observational cohort study, Level of evidence IV.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Quantifying apex mismatch: a new method to assess spinal and rod apex position in sagittal realignment

  • Clément Silvestre,
  • Thomas Chevillotte,
  • Alice Darnis,
  • Pierre Grobost,
  • Timothée Dautel,
  • Théo Cojean

摘要

Purpose

The objective of this study was to develop and validate a radiographic method to quantify the lumbar apex on calibrated EOS imaging, to compare the anatomical lumbar apex with the rod apex, and to evaluate the impact of pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) on apex location.

Methods

This retrospective cohort included 53 patients (mean age 52 ± 16 years) with a 2-year follow-up who underwent L4 or L5 PSO with sacral fixation using 40°, 65°, or 90° pre-bent rods. Pre- and immediate postoperative EOS images were assessed to measure spinopelvic parameters and spinal lordosis ratio (SLR). Differences between the lumbar and rod apices (ΔApexLL–Rod) and between pre- and postoperative spinal apices (ΔApexPreop–Postop) were calculated. Analyses used paired t-tests, ANOVA, and Pearson correlations.

Results

The lumbar apex was on average 6.1 mm (p < 0.001) higher than the rod apex. PSO induced a significant distal migration of the spinal apex of − 28.6 mm (p < 0.001). SLR increased by 92.7% postoperatively (p = 0.05). No significant subgroup differences for both ΔApex were found. Both ΔApex values correlated significantly with preoperative pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, lumbar lordosis, and SLR. Reproducibility was excellent, with ICC values over 0.87.

Conclusions

The spinal apex lies on average higher than the rod apex, and PSO induces a marked distal migration of the anatomical apex. Combined with SLR, apex analysis refines the description of early postoperative sagittal construct geometry. Clinically meaningful thresholds and associations with longer-term outcomes (mechanical events, radiographic maintenance, and PROMs) remain unknown and require longitudinal validation.

Study design

Retrospective, single-center observational cohort study, Level of evidence IV.