Scholarlink

Purpose <p>Surgical management of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis—whether decompression alone or combined with fusion—often relies on instability assessment with standing flexion–extension radiographs. However, these evaluations are influenced by low back pain and other factors, introducing variability into instability determination and surgical planning. Despite widespread use, the reproducibility of quantitative parameters remains unclear. This study evaluated the reproducibility of commonly used quantitative indicators from lumbar functional imaging.</p> Methods <p>We retrospectively analyzed 112 patients with L4–5 degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent two sets of standing flexion–extension radiographs within six months. Five parameters were measured: Changes in lumbar lordosis during flexion [ΔLL(flex)], changes during extension [ΔLL(ext)], sagittal translation (ST), posterior opening (PO), and segmental angulation (SA). Instability was defined as ST ≥ 3 mm or ≥ 8% of the upper vertebral body width, PO ≥ 5°, or SA ≥ 20°, and diagnostic consistency was examined. Two raters independently assessed all radiographs. Test-retest, intra-rater, and inter-rater reliabilities were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC [1, 1] ICC [1, 2]). Bland–Altman analysis tested fixed and proportional bias.</p> Results <p>Diagnostic discrepancies between imaging sessions occurred in 25.0–27.7%. ΔLL(flex) showed poor test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.23, 0.32), whereas ΔLL(ext) and PO demonstrated higher reliability. ST and SA yielded low ICC values. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability was consistently good (ICC &gt; 0.75), and no fixed or proportional bias was detected.</p> Conclusion <p>Variability in flexion influenced ST and SA, potentially affecting instability diagnosis. Standardized imaging protocols and clearer patient instructions are essential to improve diagnostic accuracy and reliability.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Reliability of functional imaging in assessing instability of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月5日

查看全文
  • Tomonori Morita,
  • Arihiko Tsukamoto,
  • Ryunosuke Fukushi,
  • Shutaro Fujimoto,
  • Makoto Emori,
  • Hiroyuki Takashima,
  • Tomohiro Izawa,
  • Toshihiko Yamashita,
  • Atsushi Teramoto

摘要

Purpose

Surgical management of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis—whether decompression alone or combined with fusion—often relies on instability assessment with standing flexion–extension radiographs. However, these evaluations are influenced by low back pain and other factors, introducing variability into instability determination and surgical planning. Despite widespread use, the reproducibility of quantitative parameters remains unclear. This study evaluated the reproducibility of commonly used quantitative indicators from lumbar functional imaging.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 112 patients with L4–5 degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent two sets of standing flexion–extension radiographs within six months. Five parameters were measured: Changes in lumbar lordosis during flexion [ΔLL(flex)], changes during extension [ΔLL(ext)], sagittal translation (ST), posterior opening (PO), and segmental angulation (SA). Instability was defined as ST ≥ 3 mm or ≥ 8% of the upper vertebral body width, PO ≥ 5°, or SA ≥ 20°, and diagnostic consistency was examined. Two raters independently assessed all radiographs. Test-retest, intra-rater, and inter-rater reliabilities were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC [1, 1] ICC [1, 2]). Bland–Altman analysis tested fixed and proportional bias.

Results

Diagnostic discrepancies between imaging sessions occurred in 25.0–27.7%. ΔLL(flex) showed poor test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.23, 0.32), whereas ΔLL(ext) and PO demonstrated higher reliability. ST and SA yielded low ICC values. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability was consistently good (ICC > 0.75), and no fixed or proportional bias was detected.

Conclusion

Variability in flexion influenced ST and SA, potentially affecting instability diagnosis. Standardized imaging protocols and clearer patient instructions are essential to improve diagnostic accuracy and reliability.