Scholarlink

Purpose <p>In the concept of lumbar surgical planning, it was often seen as a linear relationship between Pelvic Incidence (PI) and Lumbar Lordosis (LL) that a bigger PI referred to a larger LL. While the discovery and high prevalence of pelvic anteversion (AP) population indicated otherwise. The goal of this study was to investigate the influence of pelvic anteversion on lumbar sagittal parameters and elucidate the different PI-related lordosis patterns in asymptomatic population.</p> Methods <p>A total of 405 asymptomatic subjects were divided by their pelvic property into 2 groups: the anteverted pelvis (AP) group (<i>n</i> = 151) and the non-AP group (<i>n</i> = 254). Spinopelvic parameters including PI, pelvic tilt (PT), LL, sacral slope (SS), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 Pelvic angle (TPA), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), lumbar tilt (LT), lumbar lordosis distribution (LDI) and segmental lordosis were measured in whole spine radiographs. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to establish a PI-balanced cohort. Subsequently, the differences of spinopelvic parameters were assessed between AP and non-AP group. We also conducted a stratified analysis to explore the relationship between different pelvic incidence (PI) levels and segmental lordosis.</p> Results <p>The AP group showed distinct sagittal parameters and PI-related lordosis patterns comparing to non-AP group. The AP group showed lower PI (41.5°±6.0°), PT (4.7°±2.7°), and higher SS (37.3°±5.4°) and LL (53.0°±8.6°) than non-AP group. After propensity score matching, the cohort of 268 subjects showed no significant differences in demographic data (<i>P</i> &gt; 0.1) or PI (<i>P</i> = 0.364) between the AP and non-AP groups. However, significant differences in PT, SS, LL, TPA, L5-S1, L4-5, L3-4, L2-3, upper lumbar lordosis (L1-4) and lower lumbar lordosis (L4-S1) were observed between the two groups (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.01). Only L1-2 segmental lordosis displayed no significant difference between the 2 groups (<i>P</i> = 0.39). In addition, in each PI level, the AP group showed consistently greater LL and segmental lordosis compared to the non-AP group, with the most notable differences in the lower lumbar segments.</p> Conclusion <p>The AP group, characterized by lower PI and PT, and higher SS and LL, should be recognized as a distinct population from the non-AP group. This group also exhibits unique PI-related lordosis patterns, with consistently significant variations in segmental lordosis within each PI level compared to the non-AP group, particularly in the lower lumbar spine.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Pelvic position significantly influences the segmental lumbar lordosis: a cross-sectional study in asymptomatic population

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月8日

查看全文
  • SiYu Zhou,
  • YuDong Zhao,
  • Yi Zhao,
  • ZhiQian Luo,
  • HongBin He,
  • JunJie Ma,
  • WeiPeng Qiu,
  • GengYu Han,
  • ZhuoRan Sun,
  • Weishi Li

摘要

Purpose

In the concept of lumbar surgical planning, it was often seen as a linear relationship between Pelvic Incidence (PI) and Lumbar Lordosis (LL) that a bigger PI referred to a larger LL. While the discovery and high prevalence of pelvic anteversion (AP) population indicated otherwise. The goal of this study was to investigate the influence of pelvic anteversion on lumbar sagittal parameters and elucidate the different PI-related lordosis patterns in asymptomatic population.

Methods

A total of 405 asymptomatic subjects were divided by their pelvic property into 2 groups: the anteverted pelvis (AP) group (n = 151) and the non-AP group (n = 254). Spinopelvic parameters including PI, pelvic tilt (PT), LL, sacral slope (SS), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 Pelvic angle (TPA), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), lumbar tilt (LT), lumbar lordosis distribution (LDI) and segmental lordosis were measured in whole spine radiographs. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to establish a PI-balanced cohort. Subsequently, the differences of spinopelvic parameters were assessed between AP and non-AP group. We also conducted a stratified analysis to explore the relationship between different pelvic incidence (PI) levels and segmental lordosis.

Results

The AP group showed distinct sagittal parameters and PI-related lordosis patterns comparing to non-AP group. The AP group showed lower PI (41.5°±6.0°), PT (4.7°±2.7°), and higher SS (37.3°±5.4°) and LL (53.0°±8.6°) than non-AP group. After propensity score matching, the cohort of 268 subjects showed no significant differences in demographic data (P > 0.1) or PI (P = 0.364) between the AP and non-AP groups. However, significant differences in PT, SS, LL, TPA, L5-S1, L4-5, L3-4, L2-3, upper lumbar lordosis (L1-4) and lower lumbar lordosis (L4-S1) were observed between the two groups (P < 0.01). Only L1-2 segmental lordosis displayed no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = 0.39). In addition, in each PI level, the AP group showed consistently greater LL and segmental lordosis compared to the non-AP group, with the most notable differences in the lower lumbar segments.

Conclusion

The AP group, characterized by lower PI and PT, and higher SS and LL, should be recognized as a distinct population from the non-AP group. This group also exhibits unique PI-related lordosis patterns, with consistently significant variations in segmental lordosis within each PI level compared to the non-AP group, particularly in the lower lumbar spine.