Scholarlink

Purpose <p>The correct identification of the thoracolumbar junction is mandatory for labeling of the lumbar spine, particularly if visualized incompletely. The current state-of-the-art relies on a continuous counting-based (CCBC), a rib-length-based (RLBC), or rib-based classification (RBC) of the spine enumeration. However, the CCBC and RBC often lead to inconsistent labels depending on the visualized spine segments.</p> Methods <p>In this retrospective study, three classifications for assessing the thoracolumbar junction were evaluated in CT scans from 2005 to 2018, covering the complete thoracolumbar spine: (1) CCBC, (2) RLBC/RBC, and (3) a vertebra-shape-based classification (VSBC). The classifications were compared regarding consistent labels depending on the visualized spine segments, agreement with nerve morphology, and inter-rater reliability.</p> Results <p>CT-imaging data from 1,242 subjects (mean age, 63&#xa0;years ± 12; 771 women) were included. The VSBC led to more consistent labels than all other classifications. Only the VSBC perfectly complied with the nerve morphology (VSBC, 100%; RBC, 97.2%, RLBC, 96.3%; CCBC, 92.6%). The VSBC had slightly superior inter-rater reliability than the RBC (0.61 vs. 0.59).</p> Conclusion <p>The VSBC performs more reliably and consistently than other classifications in labeling the thoracolumbar junction, even for anatomical variants or incompletely visualized spines. Compared with rib-based classifications, the VSBC demonstrated modest but clear advantages in consistency and agreement with nerve morphology.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A vertebral shape-based classification for labeling the thoracolumbar junction on CT imaging

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年9月26日

查看全文
  • David Schinz,
  • Hendrik Möller,
  • Constanze Ramschütz,
  • Paul Platzek,
  • Robert Graf,
  • Anjany Sekuboyina,
  • Malek El Husseini,
  • Matthias Stefan May,
  • Michael Uder,
  • Claus Zimmer,
  • Jan Stefan Kirschke

摘要

Purpose

The correct identification of the thoracolumbar junction is mandatory for labeling of the lumbar spine, particularly if visualized incompletely. The current state-of-the-art relies on a continuous counting-based (CCBC), a rib-length-based (RLBC), or rib-based classification (RBC) of the spine enumeration. However, the CCBC and RBC often lead to inconsistent labels depending on the visualized spine segments.

Methods

In this retrospective study, three classifications for assessing the thoracolumbar junction were evaluated in CT scans from 2005 to 2018, covering the complete thoracolumbar spine: (1) CCBC, (2) RLBC/RBC, and (3) a vertebra-shape-based classification (VSBC). The classifications were compared regarding consistent labels depending on the visualized spine segments, agreement with nerve morphology, and inter-rater reliability.

Results

CT-imaging data from 1,242 subjects (mean age, 63 years ± 12; 771 women) were included. The VSBC led to more consistent labels than all other classifications. Only the VSBC perfectly complied with the nerve morphology (VSBC, 100%; RBC, 97.2%, RLBC, 96.3%; CCBC, 92.6%). The VSBC had slightly superior inter-rater reliability than the RBC (0.61 vs. 0.59).

Conclusion

The VSBC performs more reliably and consistently than other classifications in labeling the thoracolumbar junction, even for anatomical variants or incompletely visualized spines. Compared with rib-based classifications, the VSBC demonstrated modest but clear advantages in consistency and agreement with nerve morphology.