Scholarlink

Purpose <p>D-wave monitoring in for intramedullary spinal cord tumors is a necessary surgical adjunct in the current literature. The epidural placement of the D-wave electrode for monitoring does not help in predicting the laterality of the post-operative deficit. We present an illustrative case of how subdural placement of D-wave electrode can help us predicting the laterality of post-operative neurological deficit.</p> Case report <p>This is a case of D1-D2 pilocytic astrocytoma. The patient presented with history of dysesthetic pain with paraesthesias in all four limbs. She underwent D1-D2 laminectomy and placement of cranial and caudal Epidural D-wave electrodes for recording the basal amplitude of D-wave before starting the decompression of lesion. The caudal D-wave amplitude was noted to be lesser than the cranial D-wave amplitude. After confirming this finding, the dura was opened in midline and the segment of the spinal cord with the lesion was exposed. At this point to understand the laterality of the D-wave with respect to the neurological deficits, the D-wave electrode was inserted on either sides in the caudal subdural space upto two level below the level of the lesion. During the surgery while dissecting the tumor from the spinal cord on the left side, there was drop in left caudal subdural D-wave amplitude below 50% of the baseline with absence of Tc-MEP (motor evoked potential) signals in the left lower limb. The drop in right caudal subdural D-wave electrode was not more than 50% of baseline and MEP was intact in right lower limb. Further dissection was done more meticulously throughout the rest of the surgery. There was no further change in Tc-MEP or caudal subdural D-wave amplitude throughout the rest of the surgery. The absence of Tc-MEP signal in left lower limb with &gt; 50% decrease in left caudal D-wave amplitude (and not “absent”) suggested postoperative transient left lower limb weakness.</p> Conclusion <p>Absence of Tc-MEP signal with drop in unilateral subdural D-wave amplitude (&gt; 50%) can be helpful in predicting the laterality and permanence of the post-operative deficit.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Does D-wave predict laterality? A case report and video demonstrating use of D-wave intraoperative neuromonitoring in surgery of intramedullary spinal cord tumor to predict laterality of post-operative neurological deficit

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月24日

查看全文
  • Keyur Shah,
  • Loganathan Parani,
  • AR Prabhuraj

摘要

Purpose

D-wave monitoring in for intramedullary spinal cord tumors is a necessary surgical adjunct in the current literature. The epidural placement of the D-wave electrode for monitoring does not help in predicting the laterality of the post-operative deficit. We present an illustrative case of how subdural placement of D-wave electrode can help us predicting the laterality of post-operative neurological deficit.

Case report

This is a case of D1-D2 pilocytic astrocytoma. The patient presented with history of dysesthetic pain with paraesthesias in all four limbs. She underwent D1-D2 laminectomy and placement of cranial and caudal Epidural D-wave electrodes for recording the basal amplitude of D-wave before starting the decompression of lesion. The caudal D-wave amplitude was noted to be lesser than the cranial D-wave amplitude. After confirming this finding, the dura was opened in midline and the segment of the spinal cord with the lesion was exposed. At this point to understand the laterality of the D-wave with respect to the neurological deficits, the D-wave electrode was inserted on either sides in the caudal subdural space upto two level below the level of the lesion. During the surgery while dissecting the tumor from the spinal cord on the left side, there was drop in left caudal subdural D-wave amplitude below 50% of the baseline with absence of Tc-MEP (motor evoked potential) signals in the left lower limb. The drop in right caudal subdural D-wave electrode was not more than 50% of baseline and MEP was intact in right lower limb. Further dissection was done more meticulously throughout the rest of the surgery. There was no further change in Tc-MEP or caudal subdural D-wave amplitude throughout the rest of the surgery. The absence of Tc-MEP signal in left lower limb with > 50% decrease in left caudal D-wave amplitude (and not “absent”) suggested postoperative transient left lower limb weakness.

Conclusion

Absence of Tc-MEP signal with drop in unilateral subdural D-wave amplitude (> 50%) can be helpful in predicting the laterality and permanence of the post-operative deficit.