Scholarlink

Purpose <p>To assess the agreement between lumbar disc degeneration (DD) grading by the convolutional neural network model SpineNet and radiologist’s visual grading.</p> Methods <p>In a 14-year follow-up MRI study involving 19 male volunteers, lumbar DD was assessed by SpineNet and two radiologists using the Pfirrmann classification at baseline (age 37) and after 14 years (age 51). Pfirrmann summary scores (PSS) were calculated by summing individual disc grades. The agreement between the first radiologist and SpineNet was analyzed, with the second radiologist’s grading used for inter-observer agreement.</p> Results <p>Significant differences were observed in the Pfirrmann grades and PSS assigned by the radiologist and SpineNet at both time points. SpineNet assigned Pfirrmann grade 1 to several discs and grade 5 to more discs compared to the radiologists. The concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) of PSS between the radiologist and SpineNet were 0.54 (95% CI: 0.28 to 0.79) at baseline and 0.54 (0.27 to 0.80) at follow-up. The average kappa (κ) values of 0.74 (0.68 to 0.81) at baseline and 0.68 (0.58 to 0.77) at follow-up. CCC of PSS between the radiologists was 0.83 (0.69 to 0.97) at baseline and 0.78 (0.61 to 0.95) at follow-up, with κ values ranging from 0.73 to 0.96.</p> Conclusion <p>We found fair to substantial agreement in DD grading between SpineNet and the radiologist, albeit with notable discrepancies. These findings indicate that AI-based systems like SpineNet hold promise as complementary tools in radiological evaluation, including in longitudinal studies, but emphasize the need for ongoing refinement of AI algorithms.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Comparison of lumbar disc degeneration grading between deep learning model SpineNet and radiologist: a longitudinal study with a 14-year follow-up

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年5月15日

查看全文
  • Niko Murto,
  • Teija Lund,
  • Hannu Kautiainen,
  • Katariina Luoma,
  • Liisa Kerttula

摘要

Purpose

To assess the agreement between lumbar disc degeneration (DD) grading by the convolutional neural network model SpineNet and radiologist’s visual grading.

Methods

In a 14-year follow-up MRI study involving 19 male volunteers, lumbar DD was assessed by SpineNet and two radiologists using the Pfirrmann classification at baseline (age 37) and after 14 years (age 51). Pfirrmann summary scores (PSS) were calculated by summing individual disc grades. The agreement between the first radiologist and SpineNet was analyzed, with the second radiologist’s grading used for inter-observer agreement.

Results

Significant differences were observed in the Pfirrmann grades and PSS assigned by the radiologist and SpineNet at both time points. SpineNet assigned Pfirrmann grade 1 to several discs and grade 5 to more discs compared to the radiologists. The concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) of PSS between the radiologist and SpineNet were 0.54 (95% CI: 0.28 to 0.79) at baseline and 0.54 (0.27 to 0.80) at follow-up. The average kappa (κ) values of 0.74 (0.68 to 0.81) at baseline and 0.68 (0.58 to 0.77) at follow-up. CCC of PSS between the radiologists was 0.83 (0.69 to 0.97) at baseline and 0.78 (0.61 to 0.95) at follow-up, with κ values ranging from 0.73 to 0.96.

Conclusion

We found fair to substantial agreement in DD grading between SpineNet and the radiologist, albeit with notable discrepancies. These findings indicate that AI-based systems like SpineNet hold promise as complementary tools in radiological evaluation, including in longitudinal studies, but emphasize the need for ongoing refinement of AI algorithms.