Scholarlink

Objective <p>This study aimed to investigate which of the decompression alone (DA), decompression with fusion (DF), and decompression with dynamic stabilization (DS) produced the most favorable outcome for patients with low-grade degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (LDLS).</p> Material and method <p>Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched for all studies published before October 1, 2023. A review and data analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of three interventions was performed by Stata (version 17.0) and Review Manager (version 5.4).</p> Result <p>21 RCT studies with 3192 patients were included in the network meta-analysis. DA was superior to DF (MD = -92.05, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05; MD = -295.57, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05; MD = -2.19, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05; RR = 0.54, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05, respectively) and DS (MD = -35.69, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05; MD = -100.7, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05; MD = -295.57, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05; MD = -2.19, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05; RR = 0.54, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05, respectively) in reducing operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, and postoperative adverse events. DS was superior to DF in reducing operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospital stay (MD = -56.35, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05; MD = -194.84, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05; MD = -1.12, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05, respectively). DF was superior to DA in reducing reoperations (RR = 0.55, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). DF was superior to DA (MD = -1.44, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) and DS (MD = -0.41, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) in controlling the progression of olisthesis.</p> Conclusion <p>DA was the most favorable treatment for LDLS, reducing operative time, bleeding, hospital stay, and postoperative complications. DF outperformed DA in reducing reoperation rates. Although DS showed benefits in operative time and bleeding compared to DF, it did not offer a significant advantage over DA.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Evaluating surgical interventions for low-grade degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a network meta-analysis of decompression alone, fusion, and dynamic stabilization

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年3月20日

查看全文
  • Yize Zhao,
  • Yong Huang,
  • Zhe Wang,
  • Yueming Song,
  • Ganjun Feng

摘要

Objective

This study aimed to investigate which of the decompression alone (DA), decompression with fusion (DF), and decompression with dynamic stabilization (DS) produced the most favorable outcome for patients with low-grade degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (LDLS).

Material and method

Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched for all studies published before October 1, 2023. A review and data analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of three interventions was performed by Stata (version 17.0) and Review Manager (version 5.4).

Result

21 RCT studies with 3192 patients were included in the network meta-analysis. DA was superior to DF (MD = -92.05, P < 0.05; MD = -295.57, P < 0.05; MD = -2.19, P < 0.05; RR = 0.54, P < 0.05, respectively) and DS (MD = -35.69, P < 0.05; MD = -100.7, P < 0.05; MD = -295.57, P < 0.05; MD = -2.19, P < 0.05; RR = 0.54, P < 0.05, respectively) in reducing operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, and postoperative adverse events. DS was superior to DF in reducing operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospital stay (MD = -56.35, P < 0.05; MD = -194.84, P < 0.05; MD = -1.12, P < 0.05, respectively). DF was superior to DA in reducing reoperations (RR = 0.55, p < 0.05). DF was superior to DA (MD = -1.44, p < 0.05) and DS (MD = -0.41, p < 0.05) in controlling the progression of olisthesis.

Conclusion

DA was the most favorable treatment for LDLS, reducing operative time, bleeding, hospital stay, and postoperative complications. DF outperformed DA in reducing reoperation rates. Although DS showed benefits in operative time and bleeding compared to DF, it did not offer a significant advantage over DA.