Scholarlink

Background <p>Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a common deformity, requiring regular screening and monitoring. While radiological measurements are considered the gold standard, X-ray exposure poses significant risks. A noninvasive spinal device offers a radiation-free alternative for measuring spinal curvature. This study evaluates the validity and reliability of its measurements and explores factors associated with measurement discrepancy.</p> Methods <p>This study involved AIS patients in an outpatient setting from June to August 2023. Participants underwent device measurements to assess the scoliosis angle (SA) in the frontal plane, which were evaluated by two orthopedists and compared to radiological measurements (Cobb angle) from EOS images.</p> Results <p>A total of 112 patients were included in the study. The Cobb angle measured on EOS images was 30.3°± 12.4°. The SA measurements by observer 1, observer 2, and their average were 25.5° ± 10.9°, 25.4° ± 10.3°, and 25.4° ± 9.9°, respectively. The reliability analysis showed good agreement between observers (ICC = 0.77) and within observers (ICCs of 0.81 and 0.86). The validity analysis showed a very strong correlation between the SA and Cobb angle (<i>r</i> = 0.76). Logistic regression analysis indicated that high BMI, great scoliosis magnitude, and large maximal vertebral rotation (MVR) were associated with measurement discrepancy. Multivariate linear regression formula was: Cobb angle = 0.83×SA + 0.55×TRA + 0.21×BMI.</p> Conclusion <p>This device measurement demonstrated good reliability and validity compared with radiological measurement, highlighting its safety and feasibility for screening and monitoring AIS progression. However, high BMI, great scoliosis magnitude, and large MVR were associated with measurement inaccuracy.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A noninvasive spinal device for measuring adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: validity, reliability, and factors influencing measurement difference

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年2月4日

查看全文
  • Zhongning Xu,
  • Ronghui Cai,
  • Tenghui Ge,
  • Shuquan Zhang,
  • Guanqing Li,
  • Jintao Ao,
  • Qingyun Li,
  • Jingye Wu,
  • Zhao Lang,
  • Yuqing Sun

摘要

Background

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a common deformity, requiring regular screening and monitoring. While radiological measurements are considered the gold standard, X-ray exposure poses significant risks. A noninvasive spinal device offers a radiation-free alternative for measuring spinal curvature. This study evaluates the validity and reliability of its measurements and explores factors associated with measurement discrepancy.

Methods

This study involved AIS patients in an outpatient setting from June to August 2023. Participants underwent device measurements to assess the scoliosis angle (SA) in the frontal plane, which were evaluated by two orthopedists and compared to radiological measurements (Cobb angle) from EOS images.

Results

A total of 112 patients were included in the study. The Cobb angle measured on EOS images was 30.3°± 12.4°. The SA measurements by observer 1, observer 2, and their average were 25.5° ± 10.9°, 25.4° ± 10.3°, and 25.4° ± 9.9°, respectively. The reliability analysis showed good agreement between observers (ICC = 0.77) and within observers (ICCs of 0.81 and 0.86). The validity analysis showed a very strong correlation between the SA and Cobb angle (r = 0.76). Logistic regression analysis indicated that high BMI, great scoliosis magnitude, and large maximal vertebral rotation (MVR) were associated with measurement discrepancy. Multivariate linear regression formula was: Cobb angle = 0.83×SA + 0.55×TRA + 0.21×BMI.

Conclusion

This device measurement demonstrated good reliability and validity compared with radiological measurement, highlighting its safety and feasibility for screening and monitoring AIS progression. However, high BMI, great scoliosis magnitude, and large MVR were associated with measurement inaccuracy.