Scholarlink

<p>Retraction Watch indicates that half of the worst 10 cases of research misconduct were by Japanese researchers. This is exemplified in an article entitled ‘Tide of Lies’ published in the Journal “Science”. This article is a no holds barred view of some of the science in Japan and is an essential step on the road to prevention. However, as 3 Japanese anesthesiologists are listed in the worst 10, many Japanese academic societies point the finger at the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA). The society cannot ignore this. Prevention of research misconduct/fraud has therefore been considered. Whilst there are no measures that can completely prevent research misconduct, there are steps that can reduce its likelihood. At the researcher level, mandatory ethics training. At the department and laboratory level, central data management, regular research progress/debriefing meetings. At the academic society level, Research Misconduct Monitoring Committees should be set up to facilitate anonymous reporting. Regaining research reputation and passion in Japan is critical to moving our specialty forward. This must be done with renewed vigor for the prevention of research misconduct.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Anesthesia research misconduct in Japan: understanding the status is critical to prevention

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月11日

查看全文
  • Kazuyoshi Hirota,
  • Junichi Saito,
  • Yusuke Mazda,
  • Kazuyoshi Aoyama,
  • Koichi Suehiro,
  • Fumimasa Amaya,
  • Kiyoshi Morita,
  • Junzo Takeda

摘要

Retraction Watch indicates that half of the worst 10 cases of research misconduct were by Japanese researchers. This is exemplified in an article entitled ‘Tide of Lies’ published in the Journal “Science”. This article is a no holds barred view of some of the science in Japan and is an essential step on the road to prevention. However, as 3 Japanese anesthesiologists are listed in the worst 10, many Japanese academic societies point the finger at the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA). The society cannot ignore this. Prevention of research misconduct/fraud has therefore been considered. Whilst there are no measures that can completely prevent research misconduct, there are steps that can reduce its likelihood. At the researcher level, mandatory ethics training. At the department and laboratory level, central data management, regular research progress/debriefing meetings. At the academic society level, Research Misconduct Monitoring Committees should be set up to facilitate anonymous reporting. Regaining research reputation and passion in Japan is critical to moving our specialty forward. This must be done with renewed vigor for the prevention of research misconduct.