<p>We are interested in finding a nonlinear polynomial <i>P</i> on <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb {R}^n\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mi>n</mi> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> that solves the minimal surface equation. Even though no explicit solution is found in this article, we investigate constraints that a polynomial solution must obey. We first prove a structure theorem on such polynomials. We show that the highest degree term <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(P_m\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mi>m</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> must factor as <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(p^kQ_m\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msup> <mi>p</mi> <mi>k</mi> </msup> <msub> <mi>Q</mi> <mi>m</mi> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> where <i>k</i> is odd, <i>p</i> is irreducible, and <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(Q_m\ge 0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>Q</mi> <mi>m</mi> </msub> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> on <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb {R}^n\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mi>n</mi> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> with <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\{Q_m=0\}\subset \{p=0\}\cap \{\nabla p=0\}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">{</mo> <msub> <mi>Q</mi> <mi>m</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo stretchy="false">}</mo> </mrow> <mo>⊂</mo> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">{</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo stretchy="false">}</mo> </mrow> <mo>∩</mo> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">{</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mi> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo stretchy="false">}</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Moreover, the level sets of <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(P_m\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mi>m</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> are all area-minimizing and the unique tangent cone of <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({{\,\textrm{graph}\,}}P\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mrow> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> <mtext>graph</mtext> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> </mrow> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> at infinity is <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\{p=0\}\times \mathbb {R}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">{</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo stretchy="false">}</mo> <mo>×</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. If <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(k\ge 3\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, we know further that lower order terms down to some degree are divisible by <i>p</i>. We also show that <i>P</i> must contain terms of both high and low degree. In particular, it cannot be homogeneous. As a consequence of the structure theorem, we get degree estimates for polynomial solutions. We have <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\deg P\ge 4\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo>deg</mo> <mi>P</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>4</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> by ruling out cubic polynomial solutions. Using an extended eigenvalue estimate on the Jacobi operator by Zhu [<CitationRef CitationID="CR39">39</CitationRef>], we are able to show that <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mu _n^-&lt; \deg p +k^{-1}\deg Q_m&lt; \mu _n^+\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>μ</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mo>-</mo> </msubsup> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mo>deg</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mo>+</mo> <msup> <mi>k</mi> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mo>deg</mo> <msub> <mi>Q</mi> <mi>m</mi> </msub> <mo>&lt;</mo> <msubsup> <mi>μ</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mo>+</mo> </msubsup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> where <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mu _n^\pm =\frac{n-1\pm \sqrt{(n-3)^2-4(n-2)}}{2}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>μ</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mo>±</mo> </msubsup> <mo>=</mo> <mfrac> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>±</mo> <msqrt> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>3</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>-</mo> <mn>4</mn> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </msqrt> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mfrac> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Finally, we prove that <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\{p=0\}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">{</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo stretchy="false">}</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> cannot be an isoparametric minimal cone. We also show that for a nonlinear polynomial solution on <InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb {R}^8\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mn>8</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, we have <InlineEquation ID="IEq16"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\deg p=3\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo>deg</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and that <InlineEquation ID="IEq17"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\{p=0\}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">{</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo stretchy="false">}</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is an area-minimizing but not strictly minimizing cone in <InlineEquation ID="IEq18"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb {R}^8\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mn>8</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. These results give strong restrictions on possible polynomial solutions to the minimal surface equation.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

On polynomial solutions to the minimal surface equation

  • Yifan Guo

摘要

We are interested in finding a nonlinear polynomial P on \(\mathbb {R}^n\) R n that solves the minimal surface equation. Even though no explicit solution is found in this article, we investigate constraints that a polynomial solution must obey. We first prove a structure theorem on such polynomials. We show that the highest degree term \(P_m\) P m must factor as \(p^kQ_m\) p k Q m where k is odd, p is irreducible, and \(Q_m\ge 0\) Q m 0 on \(\mathbb {R}^n\) R n with \(\{Q_m=0\}\subset \{p=0\}\cap \{\nabla p=0\}\) { Q m = 0 } { p = 0 } { p = 0 } . Moreover, the level sets of \(P_m\) P m are all area-minimizing and the unique tangent cone of \({{\,\textrm{graph}\,}}P\) graph P at infinity is \(\{p=0\}\times \mathbb {R}\) { p = 0 } × R . If \(k\ge 3\) k 3 , we know further that lower order terms down to some degree are divisible by p. We also show that P must contain terms of both high and low degree. In particular, it cannot be homogeneous. As a consequence of the structure theorem, we get degree estimates for polynomial solutions. We have \(\deg P\ge 4\) deg P 4 by ruling out cubic polynomial solutions. Using an extended eigenvalue estimate on the Jacobi operator by Zhu [39], we are able to show that \(\mu _n^-< \deg p +k^{-1}\deg Q_m< \mu _n^+\) μ n - < deg p + k - 1 deg Q m < μ n + where \(\mu _n^\pm =\frac{n-1\pm \sqrt{(n-3)^2-4(n-2)}}{2}\) μ n ± = n - 1 ± ( n - 3 ) 2 - 4 ( n - 2 ) 2 . Finally, we prove that \(\{p=0\}\) { p = 0 } cannot be an isoparametric minimal cone. We also show that for a nonlinear polynomial solution on \(\mathbb {R}^8\) R 8 , we have \(\deg p=3\) deg p = 3 and that \(\{p=0\}\) { p = 0 } is an area-minimizing but not strictly minimizing cone in \(\mathbb {R}^8\) R 8 . These results give strong restrictions on possible polynomial solutions to the minimal surface equation.