<p>Given an axially-symmetric, <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((n+1)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-dimensional convex cone <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Omega \subset \mathbb {R}^{n+1}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mi> <mo>⊂</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, we study the stability of the free-boundary minimal surface <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Sigma \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> obtained by intersecting <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Omega \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> with a <i>n</i>-plane that contains the axis of <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Omega \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. In the case <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(n=2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Sigma \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is always unstable, as a special case of the vertex-skipping property that we recently proved in another article. Conversely, as soon as <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(n\ge 3\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Omega \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> has a sufficiently large aperture (depending on the dimension <i>n</i>), we show that <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Sigma \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is strictly stable. For our stability analysis, we introduce a Lipschitz flow <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Sigma _{t}[f]\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mi> <mi>t</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mi>f</mi> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> of deformations of <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Sigma \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> associated with a compactly-supported, scalar deformation field <i>f</i>, which satisfies the key property <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\partial \Sigma _{t}[f] \subset \partial \Omega \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>∂</mi> <msub> <mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mi> <mi>t</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mi>f</mi> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> </mrow> <mo>⊂</mo> <mi>∂</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> for all <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(t\in \mathbb {R}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Then, we compute the lower-right second variation of the area of <InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Sigma \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> along the flow, and ultimately show that it is positive by exploiting its connection with a functional inequality studied in the context of reaction-diffusion problems.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Stability of axial free-boundary hyperplanes in circular cones

  • Gian Paolo Leonardi,
  • Giacomo Vianello

摘要

Given an axially-symmetric, \((n+1)\) ( n + 1 ) -dimensional convex cone \(\Omega \subset \mathbb {R}^{n+1}\) Ω R n + 1 , we study the stability of the free-boundary minimal surface \(\Sigma \) Σ obtained by intersecting \(\Omega \) Ω with a n-plane that contains the axis of \(\Omega \) Ω . In the case \(n=2\) n = 2 , \(\Sigma \) Σ is always unstable, as a special case of the vertex-skipping property that we recently proved in another article. Conversely, as soon as \(n\ge 3\) n 3 and \(\Omega \) Ω has a sufficiently large aperture (depending on the dimension n), we show that \(\Sigma \) Σ is strictly stable. For our stability analysis, we introduce a Lipschitz flow \(\Sigma _{t}[f]\) Σ t [ f ] of deformations of \(\Sigma \) Σ associated with a compactly-supported, scalar deformation field f, which satisfies the key property \(\partial \Sigma _{t}[f] \subset \partial \Omega \) Σ t [ f ] Ω for all \(t\in \mathbb {R}\) t R . Then, we compute the lower-right second variation of the area of \(\Sigma \) Σ along the flow, and ultimately show that it is positive by exploiting its connection with a functional inequality studied in the context of reaction-diffusion problems.