<p>Let <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="526_2025_3109_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="47" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\left( M,g\right) \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mfenced close=")" open="("> <mi>M</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>g</mi> </mfenced> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> be a compact Riemann surface with area 1, we shall study the Toda system <Equation ID="Equ1"> <EquationNumber>0.1</EquationNumber> <MediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="526_2025_3109_Article_Equ1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="43" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="312" /> </MediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\begin{aligned} {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} -\Delta u_1 = 2\rho _1\left( h_1e^{u_1}-1\right) - \rho _2\left( h_2e^{u_2}-1\right) ,\\ -\Delta u_2 = 2\rho _2\left( h_2e^{u_2}-1\right) - \rho _1\left( h_1e^{u_1}-1\right) , \end{array}\right. } \end{aligned}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mrow> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd columnalign="right"> <mfenced open="{"> <mrow> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd columnalign="left"> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi> <msub> <mi>u</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> <msub> <mi>ρ</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mfenced close=")" open="("> <msub> <mi>h</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <msup> <mi>e</mi> <msub> <mi>u</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </msup> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mfenced> <mo>-</mo> <msub> <mi>ρ</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mfenced close=")" open="("> <msub> <mi>h</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <msup> <mi>e</mi> <msub> <mi>u</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </msup> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mfenced> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd columnalign="left"> <mrow> <mrow /> <mo>-</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi> <msub> <mi>u</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> <msub> <mi>ρ</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mfenced close=")" open="("> <msub> <mi>h</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <msup> <mi>e</mi> <msub> <mi>u</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </msup> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mfenced> <mo>-</mo> <msub> <mi>ρ</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mfenced close=")" open="("> <msub> <mi>h</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <msup> <mi>e</mi> <msub> <mi>u</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </msup> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mfenced> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mrow> </mfenced> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </Equation>on <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="526_2025_3109_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="47" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\left( M,g\right) \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mfenced close=")" open="("> <mi>M</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>g</mi> </mfenced> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> with <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="526_2025_3109_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="59" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\rho _1=4\pi \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ρ</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>4</mn> <mi>π</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="526_2025_3109_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="85" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\rho _2\in \left( 0,4\pi \right) \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ρ</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>∈</mo> <mfenced close=")" open="("> <mn>0</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>4</mn> <mi>π</mi> </mfenced> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="526_2025_3109_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="17" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(h_1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>h</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="526_2025_3109_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="17" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(h_2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>h</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> are two smooth functions on <i>M</i>. In Jost-Lin-Wang’s celebrated article (Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 59 (2006), no. 4, 526–558), they obtained a sufficient condition for the existence of Eq. (0.1) when <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="526_2025_3109_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="17" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(h_1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>h</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="526_2025_3109_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="17" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(h_2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>h</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> are both positive. In this paper, we shall improve this result to the case <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="526_2025_3109_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="17" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(h_1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>h</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="526_2025_3109_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="17" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(h_2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>h</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> can change signs. We shall pursue a variational method and use the standard blowup analysis. Among other things, the main contribution in our proof is to show that the blowup can only happen at one point where <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="526_2025_3109_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="17" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(h_1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>h</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is positive.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Existence results for Toda systems with sign-changing prescribed functions: Part I

  • Linlin Sun,
  • Xiaobao Zhu

摘要

Let \(\left( M,g\right) \) M , g be a compact Riemann surface with area 1, we shall study the Toda system 0.1 \(\begin{aligned} {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} -\Delta u_1 = 2\rho _1\left( h_1e^{u_1}-1\right) - \rho _2\left( h_2e^{u_2}-1\right) ,\\ -\Delta u_2 = 2\rho _2\left( h_2e^{u_2}-1\right) - \rho _1\left( h_1e^{u_1}-1\right) , \end{array}\right. } \end{aligned}\) - Δ u 1 = 2 ρ 1 h 1 e u 1 - 1 - ρ 2 h 2 e u 2 - 1 , - Δ u 2 = 2 ρ 2 h 2 e u 2 - 1 - ρ 1 h 1 e u 1 - 1 , on \(\left( M,g\right) \) M , g with \(\rho _1=4\pi \) ρ 1 = 4 π , \(\rho _2\in \left( 0,4\pi \right) \) ρ 2 0 , 4 π , \(h_1\) h 1 and \(h_2\) h 2 are two smooth functions on M. In Jost-Lin-Wang’s celebrated article (Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 59 (2006), no. 4, 526–558), they obtained a sufficient condition for the existence of Eq. (0.1) when \(h_1\) h 1 and \(h_2\) h 2 are both positive. In this paper, we shall improve this result to the case \(h_1\) h 1 and \(h_2\) h 2 can change signs. We shall pursue a variational method and use the standard blowup analysis. Among other things, the main contribution in our proof is to show that the blowup can only happen at one point where \(h_1\) h 1 is positive.