Scholarlink

Purpose <p>Oncological rehabilitation improves quality of life and convalescence after cancer therapy yet is not uniformly accessed. While physician referral patterns and structural access barriers are studied, data on patient decision-making under standardized conditions are lacking. This single-center study examines gender and sociodemographic differences in patient-initiated rehabilitation under standardized conditions to eliminate physician selection bias and make patient-side decision processes visible.</p> Methods <p>From January 2024 to December 2025, all patients treated at a radiation oncology department in Brandenburg, Germany received standardized written information about rehabilitation options and uniform support from social services. Patients who initiated rehabilitation were compared with the total cohort regarding gender, age, residence, insurance status, and diagnosis to identify sociodemographic factors in decision-making.</p> Results <p>Overall rehabilitation uptake was 17.8% (484/2,727). Females accessed rehabilitation 2.6 times more frequently than males (25.1% vs. 9.6%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Patients ≤ 65&#xa0;years had twice the uptake of older patients (25.8% vs. 12.3%, OR = 2.48, 95% CI: 2.03–3.03, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Rural residents showed higher uptake than urban residents (32.0% vs. 15.2%, OR = 2.63, 95% CI: 2.08–3.33, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Statutory health insurance patients had higher uptake than privately insured patients (18.7% vs. 10.4%, OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.36–2.90, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Rehabilitation uptake varied substantially by tumor entity, with breast cancer showing the highest rates (43.9%). Curative treatment intent strongly predicted uptake (OR = 13.73, 95% CI: 8.87–21.27, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p> Conclusion <p>Even with standardized information and administrative support, significant gender-specific and sociodemographic differences persist. Barriers extend beyond information deficits to include patient-specific factors requiring targeted interventions to achieve equitable rehabilitation access.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Patient-initiated rehabilitation after radiotherapy: gender and sociodemographic differences despite standardized support – a German retrospective single-center study

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月25日

查看全文
  • Angela Besserer,
  • Sally Mutiara,
  • Julia Boschan,
  • Michael J. Koziol,
  • Stefan Höcht

摘要

Purpose

Oncological rehabilitation improves quality of life and convalescence after cancer therapy yet is not uniformly accessed. While physician referral patterns and structural access barriers are studied, data on patient decision-making under standardized conditions are lacking. This single-center study examines gender and sociodemographic differences in patient-initiated rehabilitation under standardized conditions to eliminate physician selection bias and make patient-side decision processes visible.

Methods

From January 2024 to December 2025, all patients treated at a radiation oncology department in Brandenburg, Germany received standardized written information about rehabilitation options and uniform support from social services. Patients who initiated rehabilitation were compared with the total cohort regarding gender, age, residence, insurance status, and diagnosis to identify sociodemographic factors in decision-making.

Results

Overall rehabilitation uptake was 17.8% (484/2,727). Females accessed rehabilitation 2.6 times more frequently than males (25.1% vs. 9.6%, p < 0.001). Patients ≤ 65 years had twice the uptake of older patients (25.8% vs. 12.3%, OR = 2.48, 95% CI: 2.03–3.03, p < 0.001). Rural residents showed higher uptake than urban residents (32.0% vs. 15.2%, OR = 2.63, 95% CI: 2.08–3.33, p < 0.001). Statutory health insurance patients had higher uptake than privately insured patients (18.7% vs. 10.4%, OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.36–2.90, p < 0.001). Rehabilitation uptake varied substantially by tumor entity, with breast cancer showing the highest rates (43.9%). Curative treatment intent strongly predicted uptake (OR = 13.73, 95% CI: 8.87–21.27, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Even with standardized information and administrative support, significant gender-specific and sociodemographic differences persist. Barriers extend beyond information deficits to include patient-specific factors requiring targeted interventions to achieve equitable rehabilitation access.