Scholarlink

Purpose <p>The paucity of exercise rehabilitation services for cancer survivors indicates a research-to-practice gap. Dissemination and Implementation research addresses this gap by focusing on the adoption, implementation, and sustainability of evidence-based interventions. Dissemination, the active process of sharing research findings, is critical to the implementation of evidence-based practice. This systematic review examined adherence of exercise oncology trial protocols to the SPIRIT 2013 checklist items pertaining to dissemination planning, items 31a, 31b, and 31c, which address how dissemination is planned, authorship eligibility is considered, and what plans are in place to share data and the protocol.</p> Methods <p>A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science—Core Collection, Google Scholar, and the Central Trial Registry via Cochrane were searched (16/05/2024). Title and abstract screening, full-text review, and data extraction were completed in duplicate.</p> Results <p>Eighty-six trial protocols were included, thirty-one (36.1%) did not report dissemination plans. Item 31 was reported as follows (<i>n</i> = number of trials, frequency (%)); 31a plans to communicate trial results to: participants (<i>n</i> = 19, 22.1%), healthcare professionals (<i>n</i> = 43, 50%), the public (<i>n</i> = 25, 29.2%), and other relevant groups (<i>n</i> = 22, 25.6%), 31b: author eligibility (<i>n</i> = 3, 3.5%) and plans regarding use of professional writers (<i>n</i> = 4, 4.7%), and 31c plans for granting access to participant level dataset (<i>n</i> = 28, 32.6%), full protocol (<i>n</i> = 1, 1.2%) and statistical code (<i>n</i> = 1, 1.2%). Peer-reviewed journal (<i>n</i> = 41, 47.67%) and conferences/professional meetings (<i>n</i> = 38, 44.2%) were the most frequently reported planned dissemination strategies.</p> Conclusion <p>Reporting of the SPIRIT 2013 checklist Item 31 is generally low in exercise oncology trial protocols. Greater consideration of dissemination planning is required to support the implementation of exercise oncology research into practice.</p> <p><b>Registration:</b> <a href="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/M8HFP">https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/M8HFP</a></p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Dissemination planning in exercise oncology trials—a systematic review of trial protocols

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年5月15日

查看全文
  • Emily Smyth,
  • Lydia Politi,
  • Emer Guinan,
  • David Mockler,
  • Linda O’Neill

摘要

Purpose

The paucity of exercise rehabilitation services for cancer survivors indicates a research-to-practice gap. Dissemination and Implementation research addresses this gap by focusing on the adoption, implementation, and sustainability of evidence-based interventions. Dissemination, the active process of sharing research findings, is critical to the implementation of evidence-based practice. This systematic review examined adherence of exercise oncology trial protocols to the SPIRIT 2013 checklist items pertaining to dissemination planning, items 31a, 31b, and 31c, which address how dissemination is planned, authorship eligibility is considered, and what plans are in place to share data and the protocol.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science—Core Collection, Google Scholar, and the Central Trial Registry via Cochrane were searched (16/05/2024). Title and abstract screening, full-text review, and data extraction were completed in duplicate.

Results

Eighty-six trial protocols were included, thirty-one (36.1%) did not report dissemination plans. Item 31 was reported as follows (n = number of trials, frequency (%)); 31a plans to communicate trial results to: participants (n = 19, 22.1%), healthcare professionals (n = 43, 50%), the public (n = 25, 29.2%), and other relevant groups (n = 22, 25.6%), 31b: author eligibility (n = 3, 3.5%) and plans regarding use of professional writers (n = 4, 4.7%), and 31c plans for granting access to participant level dataset (n = 28, 32.6%), full protocol (n = 1, 1.2%) and statistical code (n = 1, 1.2%). Peer-reviewed journal (n = 41, 47.67%) and conferences/professional meetings (n = 38, 44.2%) were the most frequently reported planned dissemination strategies.

Conclusion

Reporting of the SPIRIT 2013 checklist Item 31 is generally low in exercise oncology trial protocols. Greater consideration of dissemination planning is required to support the implementation of exercise oncology research into practice.

Registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/M8HFP